it is so much better
the siginal is much better...
in where i work.. i always only get 3 bar ..
now with the intel , i am getting 4-5 bar all the time
it is a really good upgrade
-
that is not suprising... Intel wireless cards are known to be the best...
-
H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw
Atheros wireless cards are good cards, but are usually budget options. The Intel cards are usually a more expensive and better option. Mine is an Atheros AR9285 B/G/N, but it's only capable of 150mbps where true wireless N is 300mbps. Where did you get your 6200, I've been wanting to get one that's not ES.
-
The WLAN router has also relationship with the signal. With Atheros i get always full signal with 300M transfer after 1 or 2 walls, but with 5350 only 3 and 150-270M after 1 wall.
The 6200 and 6250 i saw are half tall with 2 antenna, i need a full card with 3 antenna..... -
Each spatial stream requires a discrete antenna (on both the sending and receiving end, btw). This is something to keep in mind when upgrading a laptop: one needs to be sure there are sufficient antennas. -
Sweet this is the same upgrade I'll be performing on my new laptop!
-
u would want to get a 6300 instead if u can find it... its supposed to be more faster than 6200...
-
-
remember though that there is NO industry specification of what a 'signal bar' means. Not a very good way of measuring things.
-
It's not Atheros, it's Azurewave, whatever that is
-
just upgraded to intel 6200 netcard from atheros 9285
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by furyagain, Feb 16, 2010.