I'm looking at a Sager NP8278 laptop and trying to decide on graphics card to do video editing etc. with adobe cs5...mostly actual video and low-end graphics, not high end graphics. Is the quadro K3100M (4GB) worth $350 more than the GTX 870 (6GB) for this purpose? It won't be used for gaming. Thanks!
-
It probably is... I personally would get the AMD Raedon card as even though its a gaming card, its much better than NVIDIA cards for all this stuff...
-
-
I thought I might drop the option in.. There's no harm in doing that
-
@OP get the 870M, way faster and almost twice as many CUDA cores as the K3100M. -
Thanks you!
-
Is the CUDA acceleration also part of CS6 if I upgrade? Someone told me that the quadro was important because of higher color accuracy and fewer rendering artifacts. Would you consider these concerns negligible given my purposes? I would certainly like to go with the faster 870 if I am unlikely to notice the rendering accuracy differences.
-
tilleroftheearth likes this.
-
Thank you!
quadro K3100 vs. GTX 870
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by sandra777, May 19, 2014.