I have Dell Vostro 1510
C2D 2.5Ghz/6MB
Integrated Intel X3100 GPU
4GB DDR2
HDD with 5400RPM
I want to get a laptop with dedicated GPU (not really for games, just so that it's not a bottleneck, although I don't really know how much will this help.)
I need more RAM, so I'll get like 6-8GB DDR3.
Also I want to buy an SSD, I will look the forums for recommendations and maybe I'll ask later.
But the important thing is: should I go on and get core i7 mobile CPU? or is it a mistake when Sandy Bridge is already coming?
Maybe I should get core i7 and wait for something Fusion?
Actually my CPU itself is fine for me (the C2D) so I think core i7 will be more than fine, but since Sandy Bridge is more than a CPU, maybe there is something in it to wait for?
-
Sandy Bridge is coming next week, so I would wait about 2 weeks to see what comes up. The Sandy Bridge CPU's will have integrated graphics so powerful that it will make low-end dedicated graphic cards obsolete. The integrated graphics in the Sandy Bridges will be as good as or better than the Nvdia G300 series (as far as I know). So if you don't play games, you really won't need a graphics card if you get a Sandy Bridge. Another thing is that once Sandy Bridge comes out, current notebooks will have price drops so it will be a time so save some money if you don't care about the Sandy Bridge. If you think C2D is fine, then I wouldn't get anything more than an i5, no point in spending money on a quad core if you don't need it, the i5 is already MUCH better than your C2D.
As for SSD, I know there are new technologies coming out in 2011 but im not sure when, so its up to you if you want to wait. -
Will, I don't know if my C2D is really enough. I mean I don't see it exceeding maybe 70% most of the time at Task Manger > Performance. But I use two virtual machinces and this win 7 OS. it hangs a lot that even using only one VM is pain, but what I notice is that the RAM is almost full, so I don't know if it's the CPU also or only the RAM.
As for the dedicated GPU, I notice a lot of RAM being used when I plug in the monitor, so I was like maybe what is going on this part of RAM should be on the RAM of a dedicated GPU.
So, I don't know which would be better? An dedicated GPU (with it's own fast GDDR5 RAM) or letting SandyBridge's GPU do its work...
By the way, I didn't expect SandyBridge to be at this price, at this CPU performance, come at this time, nor to be at this GPU performance. It's just like a really good thing to wait for now. Thanks for your reply. -
What do you mean by hang ?
More RAM and faster storage system would definitely help more than faster CPU unless you have lots of task switching between them.
I am running 2 XP under W7 with similar configuration as yours but don't see any 'hang', though without knowing the task you are doing, it can mean nothing.
I am using x25m 80G BTW. -
Do you use an external monitor?
The XP in VMware is really slow, I have to wait a lot for it to respond, if I assign more RAM for it, it will even make 7 slower.
Now 2 XPs in VMware is even more pain, and many times makes the whole VMware program hang/blur/stop working for small period of time.
I think I don't need that much faster CPU, but since I'm getting a new notebook it won't hurt to just get the better one (with the most recent platform.) But the Question is about the GPU now. I'll quote myself:-
-
Yes, I use a 23" external monitor.
I am not running VMWare though but Virtual PC. -
-
Thank you for your reply
Concerning switching:-
SemiAccurate :: LucidLogix brings dynamic graphics switching to Sandy Bridge
should I buy now?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by w4j3d, Dec 31, 2010.