I have old ocz vertex for almost 2 years and never had a problem.I think it's time to replace with something new and faster.
I have this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227394
-
Samsung 470 64GB or Crucial M4 64GB.
-
are you talking about this one ? Newegg.com - SAMSUNG 470 Series MZ-5PA064/US 2.5" 64GB SATA II Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
it's oly 5$ more than my 2 years old ocz vertex Newegg.com - OCZ Vertex Series OCZSSD2-1VTX60G 2.5" 60GB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
do you think it's worth to change ? -
The Vertex doesn't feel slow, does it?
-
The Vertex 1 feels to me like a modern SSD... fast.
-
I thought that newer ssd wil be even faster
my windows score give me 7.1
this is my vertex
-
Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow
I used my Vertex 1 32 GB for nearly a year, then upgraded to my 320 series 160 GB...just as fast.
-
To the normal user it will feel similar though. -
-
Englishcoder is right, 4K write should be higher.
OCZ Vertex 120GB v1.10 MLC SSD Review - CrystalDiskMark v2.2 - Legit Reviews
Small correction though, 4K writes don't really affect booting. They do affect things like installation, file copies and multi-tasking.
The lower 4K write performance might be caused by mis alignment, write caching, wrong AHCI setting or chipset problems. -
Heres my Samsung 470 64Gb bench marked today, very consistent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 253.153 MB/s
Sequential Write : 180.168 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 200.376 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 198.634 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 18.068 MB/s [ 4411.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 45.588 MB/s [ 11130.0 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 131.528 MB/s [ 32111.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 46.914 MB/s [ 11453.5 IOPS]
Test : 50 MB [C: 40.0% (23.9/59.6 GB)] (x3)
Date : 2011/07/11 8:59:16
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
Cheers
3Fees -
how to check all these -
Download AS SSD benchmark tool, open it and take a screenshot of the main window.
(do not run the actual benchmark) -
did you apply any 'tweaks'? -
-
Samsung 470 64GB SSD
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 251.860 MB/s
Sequential Write : 176.312 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 195.019 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 181.572 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 17.378 MB/s [ 4242.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 42.563 MB/s [ 10391.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 129.362 MB/s [ 31582.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 42.858 MB/s [ 10463.4 IOPS]
Test : 100 MB [C: 40.8% (24.3/59.6 GB)] (x3)
Date : 2011/07/12 12:53:32
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
WEI Score for primary hard disk : 7.6
Cheers
3Fees -
The samsung 64GB has excellent seq and random 512K writes (M4 is limited to around 100MB/s), but M4 read speeds are much better, and M4 Q32 is better... so possibly a tricky decision to make.
However, my recommendation for this thread would be to get a 128GB drive (I think 64GB drives are just too small), and there the M4 shines.
what is the best 60GB ssd ?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by fantomasz, Jul 8, 2011.