I realize a lot of people are not happy losing the vertical space with 16:9.
But wasen;t this the case when we originally moved to widescreen. E.g. with 14" laptops the high-res displays used to SXGA+ which when they became WXGA+ we lost some vertical resolution.
-
I would like to refer you to this thread:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=392545
Since there's no way in hell we're doing this again. -
My hdx16 has 16:9. Love it no problems. Some are too anal.
-
I think the reason why there is an uproar now is because of this....
4:3 = Good for web browsing
16:10 = Compromise of movies and web browsing
16:9 = Good for movies
See where I'm going with this? 16:10 accommodates more people and most people use their laptops/desktops for computer work rather than watching movies.
-
From 1920x1200 to 1920x1080, 120 pixels.
Some people find that a lot when we only have 800-900 of vertical space. I prefer a wider screen to a taller one. No one's alike though.
16:9 vs 16:10
Discussion in 'HP' started by comp_user, Sep 17, 2009.