The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Compaq R4010CA w/ AMD Sempron 3200 +

    Discussion in 'HP' started by admoore, Jun 28, 2005.

  1. admoore

    admoore Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Well ..I am about to take the plunge and replace my ailing NEC Versa. Before I do however, I would like to see additional feedback regarding the AMD Sempron ( and the notebook itself for that matter) and it's place in the CPU food chain. I like the features of the 4010 for the money ..and I feel that it would be ideal for my application ...that is word processing, excel work ...minor publisher work ...email ..playing music ... **I have been looking for awhile now ....and feel the Compaq is very good for the money ...approx. $ 1,000 CDN

    Thank you in advance for any feedback you have regarding this purchase decision ..


    Dean
     
  2. KrispyKreme50

    KrispyKreme50 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    41
    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The R4000 is a very good choice, but I recommend spending the extra 50 dollars or so to upgrade to the lowest Athlon 64. This is because the Athlon 64 has extra cache and is 64 bit compatible. These features should make your notebook last longer than having a notebook with a Sempron.

    But back to your question, here are the efficiency/performance orders of common CPUs:

    Celeron D-->Sempron-->Athlon XP-->Pentium 4-->Celeron M-->Athlon 64/Turion 64-->Pentium M

    Somebody please correct me if they think otherwise.
     
  3. miner

    miner Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    1,326
    Messages:
    7,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Oh my, it seems I will have to correct that....Celeron M is no where near the performance a Pentium 4...The highest clock speed1.5GHz C-M's are only capable of besting a P4 2.4GHz :(

    Celeron(128K)/Celeron D/Athlon XP(Sempron Socket A)/Celeron M/Sempron(socket 754 & 939)/Pentium 4/Turion64/Pentium M/Athlon64...

    Here's links to a couple of Sempron reviews...
    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2139&p=6
    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2395
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/sempron-2600.html
    http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q3/sempron/index.x?pg=1
     
  4. brianstretch

    brianstretch Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    441
    Messages:
    3,667
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I'd say it's more like:

    Celeron D-->Celeron M-->Sempron-->Pentium 4-->Pentium M-->Athlon 64/Turion 64

    And the P4 is a really, really bad idea for notebooks due to its extremely high heat.

    Really, the only reason to consider an Intel CPU is when you can't find the configuration you want with an AMD CPU. Unfortunately that's a HUGE problem, but now that AMD is suing Intel for their brass-knuckle marketing tactics (which should keep Intel's usual threats to OEMs at a minimum) and AMD's production capacity is ramping up it's likely that this situation will get much better over the next several months.
     
  5. admoore

    admoore Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    i certainly appreciate the great feedback everyone. the links are very helpful.

    indeed, i do like the configuration of the Compaq R4010CA ...it offers alot for the money ...and i think the build is durable. for sure no matter what i decide ..i will provide feedback on the machine ..

    thanks all