Hi, I am planning to buy dv6000t or 2000t, abd I prefer to Intel. But Core 2 Duo is more expensive than Core Duo.
Has any one used Core 2? Or some advice.
Does it make a much bigger difference in CPU speed than Core Duo? Or the latter have some fault in design, so Intel produces the new version? If not, I want to buy the common Core Duo...
thanks.![]()
-
The Core 2 Duo isn't much faster on most applications than the Core Duo. However the Core 2 Duo is 64bit which will be more future proof.
-
If you want to keep up with the Joneses, go for core 2 duo. My 3 cents.
-
just consider the programs you will be running...
for now, i am contended with 32-bit programs (yet). i think it will take a while for programs to fully utilize 64-bit.
by that time,i know i can still depend on my lappy -
Supposed to be like 10%-15% faster, but is application dependent. I'm assuming you're talking about the laptop version.
Here's the scoop on it.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2808&p=1
Zany -
brianstretch Notebook Virtuoso
Definitely buy the C2D over the CD, and preferably one of the 4MB L2 cache versions given how cache-dependent Intel architecture is (AMD is much less cache-dependent).
Core Duo vs Core 2 Duo?
Discussion in 'HP' started by saunter, Sep 18, 2006.