Thought I'd post this here since it's mainly concerning the dv5t.
Regarding the dv5t the questions are
1. I'm looking at the display options is 1680x1050 overkill for a 15" display. I've worked with 1280x800 display on a 15", seems pretty nice. But I've seen screenshots of people's desktops and higher resolutions look really nice and clean.
2. If I did get the display with the res of 1680x1050, would the Intel integrated graphics card be enough? I don't game (Just The Sims 2, and Phantasy Star Online Blue Burst) much. Mostly do Photoshop stuff (from what I understand all Photoshops till CS4 don't utilize the GPU for rendering, and have been solely CPU. Reason why CS4 is a big deal I believe.)
3. How much would the integrated graphics vs the dedicated graphics boost the battery. In the review, the reviewer got about 2 hours and 40 minutes with a graphics card, and said probably well over 3 hours with the integrated if he had that option. I have a Gateway CX210X convertible laptop, I get an average of 4 hours and 30 minutes to 5 hours of battery life (w/ wifi off of course), on I think an 8-cell. Can I expect about the same from the dv5t on the "High Capacity 6-cell" (with wifi off of course)? I would think regular laptops would have better battery life than convertible tablets because they aren't powering a digitizer. Is the "High capacity 6-cell" worth the extra 30$?
Regarding AMD processors.
I don't really know much about AMDs processors, and from what I understand in the dv5t, that P7350 is the same one used in the new MacBooks that just came out, and are based on "penryn" which I understand has a better energy efficiency (TDP of 24W instead of the usual 34W? somewhere around those numbers), and better performance, about at least a 10% boost vs the older Merom processors. Which AMD processor stacks up to "Penryn?"
Thanks![]()
-
I also got around 2 hours and 40 minutes on a high capacity w/ a p8600 cpu and the 9600m gt gpu, and i barely did anything, almost had everything off and idled. I don't think you would get even more than 4 hours on a high cap even with a low gpu/cpu. Opt for a 12 cell battery. The resolution doesn't matter for your graphics card unless on videos/games you play at that resolution.
Dv5t uses intel not amd. The dv5z uses amd. -
Hi sDreamer,
I have the AMD Turion X2 Ultra (ZM-82 2.2GHz) with the ATI Radeon HD3200 graphics card (Integrated) in my HP DV4Z notebook. AMD processors are decent performers. I appreciate the cost savings and overall performance. It runs everything I throw at it well (Casual gaming like COD4, GTR2...), Watching HD clips, Photoshop Elements and boring stuff (MS Office). I get ~2.5 hours of battery life using it for light duty stuff (MS Office, e-mails, etc.).
I agree with Chango99, get the 12-cell. -
thanks for the replies. Greatly appreciated. I think I'll stick with the dv5t so I can stay with an intel processor. I'll probably opt for the 12-cell. Does any one have the 12-cell and would mind to comment on how much they get out of it on a single full charge? Thanks. One other thing, my question regarding the resolution hasn't really been answered except for the graphics chip part of it, is 15" too small for a 1680x1050 res? I could understand on larger displays, but is it still easy to read text at this high of a resolution on a small display(compared to what's available to desktops)?
-
You would get 5+ hours under light conditions.
Couple questions regarding configuration of a dv5t and some AMD processors.
Discussion in 'HP' started by SDreamer, Oct 21, 2008.