The Compaq version of the Dv2000 is SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper than the HP version. Upgrading the Compaq version also costs less. Why? Is there something that I need to know about the Compaq version? Why would anyone buy the HP branded version when it's so much more? I'm specifically interested in the Turion version, but I have not yet ruled out the Core Duo. I just don't understand the price difference! Is there a quality/reliability issue? Also how will the quality compare to HP's older dv1000?
Thanks,
-
I'm not sure what "so much more" is... is it a $100? $200?
The only differnces that I'm aware of is, the HP comes (standard???) with the built in 1.3mp camera and dual microphones. The compaq, I believe, doesn't offer that option.
Also, the HP has touch-technology buttons, which enable users to launch media applications and control volume and mute functions with a swipe of thier finger. The Compaq has the touch technology buttons as well, but only for volume control and launching quick play, no media buttons (fast forward, play/pause, fast rewind etc)
Compaq also weights slightly more then the HP.
If the camera isn't a big deal to you, go with the Compaq. They also look different, but they both look great!
Just curious, how much are you actually saving?
Dv2000 from HP or Compaq???? Help!
Discussion in 'HP' started by mclar22, Jul 5, 2006.