Both are new and feature essentially the same components. When configured to my liking the price is nearly identical, so I guess I'm wondering if any of you know why one is superior to the other. Aside from cosmetics, what's the difference?
Comments?
P.S. - both would feature the dedicated GPU (X700) and same CPU, OS, ect.
-
-
In a comparison between the dv1000 and v2000 http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2077&review=compaq+v2000+hp+dv1000 (same small 12" notebooks from HP / Compaq) the author kept the v2000 -- but only because of two small issues , one with the screen and the other the system clock. I don't know if the dv4000 has the viewing angle issue the dv1000 does and it doesn't even bother some people. I like the look of the dv4000 better to be honest and would go with that based on cosmetics, if the price is different though I'd go with the cheaper one -- they're so similar it almost doesn't matter.
If you're really bold, you could buy both and return one if you get them from a store that has a very liberal return policy. -
I'm sure each has their benefits and liabilities when compared head-to-head, and thanks for the reply. I too BTW agree that the cosmetics of the dv4000 are superior, but that's simply a matter of personal preference that may vary among others.
HP dv4000 or Compaq V4000T...which?
Discussion in 'HP' started by joseywales, Sep 30, 2005.