Hi
i have a dv5t that comes with a stock broadcom wireless card.
i have an opportunity to acquire an Intel WiFi Link 5100 card , will i see a noticeable improvement in my wireless performance?
tnx
-
-
you might see a noticable worsening of your migraines (if you have any) trying to make the 5100 optimally use wireless N speeds.
if possible (and not whitelisted) i'd tr and acquire a 5300 and use that on 2 antennas vs the 5100.... if you want perf.
thing is i might have been overtly critical of the 5100...but the amount of issues related to it and trying to get it to work on wireless N speeds..consistent 150 ( still unable to achieve...standard i get is 127-130) is still difficult (for me atleast)...but using it on "b" is no problems whatsoever -
well , of curse i would prefer the 5300 , but my laptop only has 2 antennas , and putting in a 3rd one is not an option at this time.
if i connect it (5300) with only 2 antennas instead of 3, it will hurt its performance , wouldn't it? -
I can contest to the fact that the 5100 is a piece of crap if you try to connect to wireless N. I too wanted to upgrade to the 5300 but have no idea where I would put the 3rd antenna.
-
well , as far as i know you can connect the 5300 with only 2 antennas and it will work , the question is if there is a big diff in performance between connecting it with 3 antennas or 2 ?
-
5100 sucks . just got wireless N and its refusing to go over 40. G is capped at 34 i think. all drivers are up to date n everything. this is driving me nuts. how can i make it work?
-
-
a year plus here, i have heard, the 5100 behaves quite well with routers using the RALINK chip, any idea 'bout that
-
anyways...i'd say upgrade the wireless lan, and let it fly, cuz' the only thing that will happen at the most will be you not getting the capable bandwidth, it's still gotta be better than the 5100
-
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=338874
Intel 5100 vs the broadcom stock on a dv5t
Discussion in 'HP' started by SeaMonster, Sep 8, 2009.