Here's a quick question about undervolting Athlon 3500+ (Newcastle core).
I undervolted my zv6000 and frankly, I was amazed when the cpu worked at 5x with 0.850v (1 ghz). The only problem I encountered was that I could not set the Athlon to work at 800mhz, that is 4x, no matter what voltage I set. As soon as I create a 4x P-transition state, the notebook freezes. I also noticed that if RMClock is disabled and I let Windows manage the throttle, the CPU would again only go to 1ghz and not 800mhz.
I thought this was the way Athlon 64 works and forgot about it. Yet, today I visited RMclocks' site and found this
![]()
( here's the link: http://cpu.rightmark.org/products/rmclock.shtml)
The Athlon64 on the screenshot is working at 4x, 800mhz. Can anyone tell me why I cannot set my zv6000 this way? Is there a fundamental difference between the Clawhammer and the Newcastle cores? Or could it be that I was using RMclock 1.8 there?
Thanks
-
May be new castle core does not go below 5x. My friends Athlon64 did not go below 5x either.
-
If you check the datasheet for the Newcastle A64 3500+, the minimum P-state is 1000Mhz (5x). Other revisions can go to 800Mhz (4x).
-
Oo, my desktop has a clawhammer Athlon 64 3200+
-
The S939 newcastle can only go upto a minimum multiplier of 5x. It is a given fact that HP uses a desktop processor and there is no need to go down all the way to 800MHz since it does not yield that much of an improvement in a desktop environment.
-
Thank you guys, it's good to know there's nothing wrong.
Undervolting Athlon64 3500+
Discussion in 'HP' started by vassil_98, Mar 7, 2006.