The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    decent antivirus for dv9500 w/ vista 32 bit?

    Discussion in 'HP' started by avillabon, Sep 20, 2007.

  1. avillabon

    avillabon Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    510
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I got my new dv9500 a few days ago and since i had never used vista before my question is for those of you who already have and antivirus. Which would you recommend? i would like it to be reliable but also important if it isnt a resource hog.. What are you guys using?

    Alex
     
  2. Alemaker

    Alemaker Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    29
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  3. Bailey

    Bailey Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Avast! it's free and works perfectly
     
  4. waterlover112

    waterlover112 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Avast is nice. If you want something different, I also use OneCare by Microsoft. You can use it on up to 3 different computers. Version 2 is in beta right now and should be being released soon which adds printer sharing etc.

    Also another thing that I recommend is Ad Aware. It is also free and great at removing spyware.
     
  5. robvia

    robvia Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    FreeAVG is also a good one.
     
  6. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Mime with Tourette's

    Reputations:
    1,163
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Search, and find.
     
  7. blue13x

    blue13x Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    42
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Either AVG or Avast free should be ok
     
  8. zfactor

    zfactor Mastershake

    Reputations:
    2,894
    Messages:
    11,134
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    455
    nod32 imo the best out there its about as light as you will find, kaspersky being a close second for me
     
  9. orev

    orev Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    809
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I have a problem paying money to a company for a product that's supposed to fix problems they themselves created in another product.
     
  10. hr_phenom

    hr_phenom Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Clamwin is decent and free and so is Avast. For paid options, McAfee is good. Norton is good but expensive and some-what resource hungry!
     
  11. Alemaker

    Alemaker Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    29
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Not to mention, it also failed on the last two independent av scan tests!
    :eek2:
     
  12. orev

    orev Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    809
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Clamwin does not provide real-time scanning, which largely limits it's effectiveness. It might be good for servers that have a scheduled job to run it, otherwise I wouldn't use it on a desktop system.
     
  13. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Mime with Tourette's

    Reputations:
    1,163
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I would rather have real-time scanning than ad-hoc scanning, which is exactly what avast! provides (although I can initiate an ad-hoc scan as well).
     
  14. Meowsley

    Meowsley Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I have to disagree with you on the McAfee. I installed it on my desktop and I swear it always took a painfully long time to boot up.

    As to the OP's question, I've heard that Nod32 is the least "resource hungry" AV program out there. I haven't bought it yet as I'm trying out Avast and all I can say is ... so far, so good. :)
     
  15. orev

    orev Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    809
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Avoid Norton and McAfee like the plague. They really, REALLY suck. I don't know how Norton stays in business.
     
  16. azianai

    azianai Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Depending on your resources and requirements, it may be better to look up the reviews and see what you want in an antivirus system. Consumer Reports i believe reviewed a bunch of them and found AVG to miss a lot of items. I have symantec corporate edition installed for my father's vista home premium x86 (my school gave it away for free), but its not compatible for x64. I myself use kaspersky internet securities 7.0 but mainly because it was Free after rebates from staples. All in all, antivirus is more of a reaction than a prevention system, so i wouldn't bother too much with it. Get something on the cheap side and mainly to stop windows from buggin you about your securities =)
     
  17. Rottie

    Rottie Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I heard Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic has the best detection rate and low resource but will not scan POP3....It is free.
     
  18. hr_phenom

    hr_phenom Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30

    McAfee is honestly not that bad. I had it for quite some time and then switched to Avast since I graduated and am no longer in school. I had McAfee v8.1 provided by the school and it was decent and wasn't as resource hungry as Norton was. For sure, Avast has a much smaller footprint that both McAfee or Norton. But as for effectiveness, McAfee was better than norton was. Norton used to be good about 4 years ago. Since then they've just gone down.
     
  19. HI DesertNM

    HI DesertNM Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    196
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Whether its light on resources or not is not the only reason to avoid McAfee. McAfee has a crap detection rate along with Norton. Norton, is basically a virus.. and also has a poor detection rate. I use Kaspersky and its very light with one of the best detection rates. If you are foolish enough to use Norton, be sure you use their uninstall tool instead of the add/remove when you decide to dump it.. and you will decide that. :)
     
  20. System64

    System64 Windows 7 x64

    Reputations:
    94
    Messages:
    1,318
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Avast! antivirus and AVG are free alternatives. Great virus protections.
     
  21. hr_phenom

    hr_phenom Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I meant that McAfee has decent virus detection and removal capabilities. Norton many times detected something but couldn't remove it. McAfee was a lot better in that respect. I agree though that Norton is crap and shouldn't be used.

    The worst situation comes up when you try and install both McAfee and Norton at the same time. They each detect the other as a suspicious items and raise alarms constantly. Its amusing, really.