Could someone confirm this? From what I found, x200s and x61s have about the same width and thickness, but x200s is 295cm long, while x61s is 268cm long. That's a big difference! of course x200s has wide screen, but for portability (x61s) smaller size is preferable.
-
i think they are both really portable. if they actually had a trackpad id have one too. no trackpad = no deal.
-
The X200 is larger. The X200 has a full-size 7-row keyboard, while the X61 has a shrunken keyboard.
This review has some comparison shots. -
Also, x200s seems lighter than x61s, the lightest Thinkpad perhaps? -
Yes, it is larger and has a full-sized keyboard as midnightsun said. I personally think it is worth it. The additional width is not really a huge factor to me because it is still very portable yet is a pleasure to type on.
-
-
Ridiculous to be using a widescreen display on a ultraportable.
-
Both the x200s and x61s are good choices. However, if you like high resolution screens, full size keyboards, and/or the maximum battery life (45nm Penryn LV, and LED display) then the x200s has a clear advantage. -
The X61s keyboard is pretty phenomenal in its own right, even if the keys are a smidgen smaller.
-
Is x200s larger in size than x61s?
Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by vaw, Mar 20, 2009.