The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Need to replace hard drive...got some questions

    Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by dblb48, Jun 9, 2009.

  1. dblb48

    dblb48 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Im going to replace my 160 gb hd because I need to in order for my comjputer to work, haha. So i was going to go w/ a 500 gb or a 320 gb hd. My questions are: I am looking at a 500 gb at 7200 rpm w/ 16 cache...is it worth the extra 30 dollars as opposed to the cheaper one at 5400 rpm and 8 cache? Or should I go with a 320 at 7200 rpm and 16 cache for about 60 bucks cheaper? thanks for any help
     
  2. mullenbooger

    mullenbooger Former New York Giant

    Reputations:
    298
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    It really depends on you as well as the specific models. If you tell us the brand and model number we can tell you which ones are faster. If the 7200rpm 500gb drive is the seagate, I believe that is currently the fastest notebook hard-drive. If the 5400rpm is a 2-platter 500gb, then that and the 320gb 7200rpm drives should be roughly similar in speed (i think the 320gb 7200rpm is slightly faster). Is it worth 60bucks to get a smaller drive, I dunno, depends if you need the space.
     
  3. Renee

    Renee Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    610
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    If speed is important you'd do well to get a 7200 rpm disk. They draw the same amount of power (I am using the word with great precsion).
    -Renee
     
  4. mattmcss

    mattmcss Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    76
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I would probably go with the 320GB 7200 RPM drive with 16mb cache, I don't know this for sure but I know the first batch of 500GB 7200 rpm drives had problems, not sure if they've been revised since.
     
  5. Renee

    Renee Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    610
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Yes. yes, Matt.
    -Renee
     
  6. mattmcss

    mattmcss Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    76
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Issues with the first gen have been fixed?
     
  7. jaredy

    jaredy Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    793
    Messages:
    2,876
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Power consumption is not identical from drive to drive. A 7200rpm disk will generally consume more power, but that isn't to say faster drives have not become more efficient, just that isn't a general fact.
     
  8. dblb48

    dblb48 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    thanks for the insight guys. Also, Im running a T61.
    I heard in another thread that the t61 wont support SATA 3.0 GB/s, so I need a 1.5...is that true because I have googled it and it seems as if though the T61's motherboard will support all of em...
     
  9. jaredy

    jaredy Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    793
    Messages:
    2,876
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    A SATA 3.0 GB/s type drive will work just fine. The bus is just limited. You are not going to hit any speeds that would warrant being concerned about that limitation unless you were using an ultra fast SSD.
     
  10. Renee

    Renee Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    610
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    A 7200 rpm disk will draw more current but for a shorter amount of time which is why I chose power. Btw, Hitachi rates them the same.
    -Renee