It seems all the thinkpad and ideapad (at least S10) are wide screens? Does Lenovo still make 4:3 screens?![]()
-
why are you sad?
they will make what is demanded... -
If you put a normal 15" XGA screen next to a 15.4" WXGA screen the difference is very dramatic. The 15.4" has much more usable space on it. The only reason I would use (and do) is for old games that do not support widescreen, so it stretchs the images.
-
-
I don't play games at all
I use word processing a lot and 4:3 is for that. Web browsing also prefers 4:3. My two eyes are not that far apart
P.S. This may seem trivial for some, but for me, two big reasons I choose Thinkpad is: Matt (anti-glare) screen, and 4:3! -
-
Thanks for the windowed hiint.
I'm sorry that you can't get that screen. I know different people like different things. I think some business HP's might have 4:3 matte. -
The trend towards 16:10 aspect ratios and believe or not it will move towards 16:9 in the future is due to cost. It is cheaper for the laptop LCD manufactures to similar aspect ratios and left over pieces from TV production.
-
- Tim -
web browsing also sucks at 4:3, same thing. 2 windows -
I use two 24 inch widescreens.... but in my defense.. i use to have 17inch crt and use to work on 15.4 inch widescreen (laptop lcd)... and currently if i'm not at my desk.. i'm working on a 12.1 inch widescreen. -
-
I prefer 4:3 as well, especially on a 14" notebook. SXGA+ is almost as wide as WXGA+, but has much more vertical resolution, which translates into less scrolling for Office, Internet and the like. More white space on the side doesn't do anything for me. I personally find anything below WSXGA+ not really conducive for viewing documents side be side. There's nothing wrong with widescreen. I just wish it wasn't jammed down my throat with no choice. The IPS screens offered in the past were better than anything that's available on the market right now. -
Exactly what ZaZ says!
There was a lot of demand for te T61 14" 4:3, but the shipping times were horrible.
To all those "two windows side-by-side" posters: well, you can really fit a second window in 40 pixels, huh? And you didn't do anything with that 150 pixels vertical you lost? Come on, give me a break.
14" 4:3 was 1400x1050, 14" wide now is 1440x900, so it dropped from useable to 'scroll yourself into RSI'.
The same goes for the IPS screens: there is demand for it, but they just dropped it. Nobody asked them to drop it. -
I prefer 4:3 ratio screen too and I bought my 14" T61p because of that. and I love the screen. Besides, it's more portable than the 14" widescreen model. It's kinda sad that they don't make TP with 4:3 ratio screen any more.
-
One of the nicest things about Thinkpad used to be that 4:3 brick-like appearance. I'd rather they offer 4:3 at slightly higher price. -
Yes, indeed it kinda sucks no more Lenovo's 4:3, since Thinkpads are originally geared to enterprise level, why the heck change to WS since enterprises can afford to buy those laptops.
I also got lucky when I got my T61 4:3 SXGA+, I upgraded to the same resolution (1400x1050) pixels. I see no more SXGA+ on eBay right now, but they appear from time to time on Thinkpads.com forum. -
4:3 here ... and loving it.
- how can you say that web browsing or word processing is better on wide screen vs. on standard, lol. Even when open 2 docs/pages you still see/work on one at a time, and that one will be smaller than if you had opened only that one on standard screen. -
Calling it 'wide screen' gives the wrong impression that it is a larger screen, when in fact it is narrower vertically and the area is actually smaller. The 4:3 also fits most bags better.
-
-
Well today the options for more then 1000 vertical lines are 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 on the 15.4" and larger screens (the second resolution one is simply ridiculous for laptop use). Personally 1680 lines on the horizontal are something that I don't need at all...
Somebody figured out that recently that wide was better for viewing then 4:3 and movies were widescreen...all this shift to wide is for profit only. -
I'll also have 4 or 5 Vim windows open, and the more vertical space I get for each of them the better. I don't mind if they are staggered (and a widescreen LCD isn't nearly wide enough to have them all side-by-side anyway, or even 2 or 3).
Personal taste, anyway.
- Tim -
I think you're talking about using an external display - I already do use a 1600x1200 external display at home, so when my laptop's docked, no problem. But that doesn't help on the road.
- Tim -
- Tim -
SXGA+ here (14.1" T60). I love it. Sadly, though, I don't see 4:3 screens making a comeback. We're going to have to get used to widescreens.
-
There's always Panasonics.
-
-
Put blame where it's due here. The reason why 4:3 and IPS screens are no longer available is that the LCD manufacturers decided to stop making these classes of panels.
The demise of IPS in laptops and sub-$1000 desktop monitors is a classic case of bad products driving out good products through adverse selection. It's much more profitable for LCD manufacturers to hide information from consumers in order to mislead them into purchasing TN high profit margin panels than it is to sell IPS panels. As a result, IPS has vanished from the market. -
Yup. Knowledge is power.
No more standard 4:3 screen?
Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by kns, Nov 19, 2008.