The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    T61 Performance: 100G-7k vs 320G-5k x2 RAID in Ultrabay?

    Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by crashnburn, Mar 16, 2013.

  1. crashnburn

    crashnburn Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    T61 Performance: 100G-7k vs 320G-5k x2 RAID in Ultrabay?

    I have a few 320G WD (Slow / 5400 or so drives) and a 100G Hitachi (7200 drive) kind of lying idle for experiments as I am moving a bunch of that stored data to a NAS.

    Mostly I will want to run VMs on it for Middleware and similar Enterprise tools. A little portable play box.

    I am wondering the following:

    - RAID Possibilities on T61 with Ultrabay HDD - At all Possible? - With Desktop or Server instance of Windows / Linux / Maybe a Bare Metal Virtualization Environment?

    - If at all possible, Performance comparative between the two options below:

    A - 320G-5k x 2 - RAIDed (Slower Drives Raided)

    B - 100G-7k (Main) + 320G/120G (5k) (2nd in Ultrabay)

    Even if the above RAID is not possible in the T61 (from my signature), any thoughts / experiences on how this A vs B would compare/ perform on a MACHINE that could support the RAID.

    Thoughts from the respected veterans and experts. :) ??
     
  2. Commander Wolf

    Commander Wolf can i haz broadwell?

    Reputations:
    2,962
    Messages:
    8,231
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Insignificant performance delta compared to switching to an SSD :p
     
  3. jedisurfer1

    jedisurfer1 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    41
    the main hd bay is sata 1 (sata 2 if you have middleton bios) the ultrabay on the t61 is pata ide. So raid would not really work.
     
  4. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    5,036
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    3,134
    Trophy Points:
    681
    Agreed with Commander Wolf here: if you're looking at a performance increase, you're better off getting a SSD and Middleton BIOS (if you don't have that already). Not only will you max out seq. read/write with a SSD, but you also get much better random access times as well as less power used / less heat produced.
     
  5. crashnburn

    crashnburn Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I have an SSD and I was the only high schooler with a SCSI drive at home :p

    PS: I appreciate the feedback. I was just curious as I had some spare drives lying around and wanted to figure out how I could play this.
     
  6. happyfrappy

    happyfrappy Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Why don't you use a two port eSATA ExpressCard for RAID? There are a few which handle stable SATA I/II speeds and there are pocket-friendly 2.5" enclosures which support two drives--if you want bus powered, FW400/800 RAID is possible to do with an ExpressCard. I would avoid the long discontinued SIIG eSATA card which had hardware level RAID 1, performance is below par for eSATA and has unpredictable rebuild if you had to switch out a failing drive.

    On the weekends I use my spare T61 as a media server, works good enough with two eSATA drives and a FW400. I only use my ultrabay for Acronis TrueImage, even with the middleton BIOS patch the ultrabays' SATA-PATA bridge still cripples it to SATA 1... only reason I don't bother using a 7200 RPM drive in there, a single platter 7mm Hitachi 320GB HDD is a good performer(close to 7200 RPM access times) and lower heat/power vs typical 5400 RPM drive.
     
  7. crashnburn

    crashnburn Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I will look deeper into the options you suggested and revert back later. Thanks.