Can anyone verify this?I've read that 4MB L2 Cache is useless especially if your OS is XP PRO!! to what extent is this true?
![]()
Also, It would be helpful if any T61 owner using XP PRO can verify this...
some of these XPP compatibility post are making me have second thoughts about ordering XXP
-
This is false. Totally and thoroughly false. 4MB Cache > 2MB Cache > 1MB Cache > 512K Cache > 256... etc
-
-
well according to the article the improvements seen are throughout various programs (games) so it should be helpful regardless. it goes with the theory bigger is better
-
More cache helps no matter what OS you use, its built into the cpu to store data.
-
In a few hours, there's gonna be a guy here that sells you the religion where "in real-world performance, the 4mb cache will be useless because you can use AIM, iTunes, and Firefox without 4mb of cache. I supposedly did all those things simultaneously and efficiently with a Pentium 4m, but don't ask me why I decided to buy a new ThinkPad." (if you know i'm talking about you, know that I'm saying this in jest and good-nature
)
When that happens, just recall that I told you, "If all you care is about the minimum required to do what you need to do on your laptop successfully, then get a Celeron." Hell, get an OLPC: If we can rest the future of our world on using OLPC's in the classroom, you can use the OLPC to accomplish whatever measley thing you need to in the present.
T61/T61p INTEL T7*** 4MB L2 Cache Useless???
Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by abf092, Jul 31, 2007.