Im trying to figure out why anyone would go T530 over W530.
(barnes and noble pricing)
With nvs5400m, and a dual core ivy i7 and fhd the t530 goes for around 1300
With the k1000m the same i7 and fhd the W530 goes for about $100 cheaper.
They are both the same weight according to their respective data sheets(5.7-6lb) and have the same battery life on optimus. The k1000m in the w530 should be roughly 2x as powerful as the nvs5400 ( http://www.nvidia.com/content/PDF/product-comparison/Quadro_Mobile_Product_Comparison.pdf) So why would anyone buy the t530?
The only slight differences that I see are that the k1000m has a 10w higher power consumption(45 vs 35) I could also see that the t530 might be cheaper if you dont get the 5400m. But then I would assume you would be better off getting the t430 if you planned to stick with the hd4000.
Opinions?
-
At the same time, there are users who want a larger and better screen (15.6" FHD 1920x1080), but do not need the high-end CPU/GPU power. They can have a T530 with i5-3210M, integrated HD 4000 and FHD screen for about $900. A 6-cell battery and a 65W AC adapter would make the notebook more manageable.
-
I mean it'll be smaller/ligter for the same price, and you'll probably get 1600x900 in the t530 if you're getting igpu so no screen real estate lost
I see your point though, for more mainstream users (who still want fhd/a larger screen without a dedicated card) it makes sense.
It strikes me odd that they don't just give the w530 a no video card option aswell, and cut the t530. They could cut the nvs5400m too. -
Well, that is not the only instance of irrational product planning by Lenovo. Just look at the number of products and the number of per-product configuration options.
I see Lenovo as a haphazard bazaar more than a well-organized boutique. -
I ended up purchasing the T530, i5-3360M, FHD Screen, NVS5400M and 90w adapter. I configured a W530 with similar specs and it was more expensive, plus the 135w adapter makes the system too heavy to carry around for me. I don't need the extra power that comes from Quad Core and the NVS is good enough for me. I ended up paying 1300 tax included so I'm not complaining
-
^^^ Very nice.
If you have received your T530, do share your feeling about the keyboard. -
Oh, one more thing about the T530 vs W530: The W series charges an extra $40 for backlit keyboard, it's no cost on the T530/430 -
Why did I buy a T5xx instead of a W5xx? I needed a discrete card but didn't exactly NEED a full CAD workstation. For light-duty CAD and occasional gaming it does the trick. An i5 with nVidia, 4GB RAM, 1600x900, 9cell and other assorted goodies came to $800 something before tax.
I also wanted something slightly larger than my T400 whose resolution was starting to wear thin on my patience; it was troublesome to write a paper while citing a source using Windows Snap.
W530 over T530?
Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by Moiraine, Jun 17, 2012.