I read in this forum how an LED backlight is prefered over the CCFL backlight. Is this true? Why does Levovo recommend the CCFL backlight?
15.4 WXGA TFT, w/ LED Backlight [subtract $49.50]
15.4" WSXGA+ TFT, w/ CCFL Backlight [Lenovo recommended]
-
The first one has a 1280x800 resolution. The second, 1680x1050.
-
There's nothing magical about LEDs. They're brighter and offer some more battery life, but image quality is not necessarily any better.
-
I believe old 4:3 panels were crappier than 'new' 16:10 CCFL powered panels, they have better contrast and more brilliant, even though LED ones offer superior battery life.
I would pick up a high res CCFL against a low res (WXGA) LED one. -
Stewie Griffin Notebook Consultant
Here are some things to consider:
Size: LED monitors are thinner than CCFL
Brightness: LED has that glossy finish, making it more susceptible to glare but offers more vibrant colors
Lifespan- LED again wins in this category. CCFL output decreases over time. End of life is when they are half as bright. LEDs are solid state devices, so that problem wont occur
Power: LED draws more power
Cost: LED is more expensive
You can read all of this at this website.
http://gamers-underground.com/forum...ticle-about-ccfl-vs-led-wled-lcd-screens.html
CCFL left, LED right
CCFL left, LED right -
-
The resolution on the CCFL is why its recommended. 1280x800 in anything bigger then 12in is painful for multi-taskers.
-
-
Viewing angle isn't dependent on backlight. It is dependent on the panel type and pretty much all notebooks use TN panels, which have the worst viewing angles.
-
Stewie Griffin Notebook Consultant
-
i'm also highly skeptical of that article, in particluar the power consumption bit. according to what i know (and wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LED-backlit_LCD_television ), led uses less power (up to 40%, says wikipedia). it is literally the first time i've read that led uses more power...
Which display is better?
Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by higgledy, Nov 17, 2009.