The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    help to choose T43

    Discussion in 'Lenovo' started by bigcatlu, Nov 13, 2005.

  1. bigcatlu

    bigcatlu Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I've two choices from EPP:
    1)2687D4U. 15 sxga+, 1.86G, 512M,40G, DVD+CDRW, ATI X300, no finger reader, no bluetooth, 6 cell, 3 year warr. $1236.
    2)2687DUU. 15 sxga+, 1.86G, 512M,60G, DVDRW, ATI X300, finger reader, bluetooth, 9 cell, 3 year warr. $1424.

    My budget is limited. Compared 2) to 1), do the additional 20G, DVDRW, finger reader and bluetooth worth 200 bucks?
    I heard that Bluetooth and finger reader are useless.
     
  2. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    It is only worth it if you plan to use it.
     
  3. sparta.rising

    sparta.rising Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Formatted, the 40gb is less than 40gb, prolly like 38 or so. Then take out another 8gb for IBM's hidden partition for recovery, you'll only get about 30gb, then subtract the space required for WinXP, is that enough space for you?
    If you've got bluetooth devices, then its worth it. If you intend to burn dvd's, then its worth it, if security and ease is an issue, the fingerprint reader is worth it. It also has a 6 cell instead of a 9 cell battery, so if additional battery life is important, its worth it. (or if you're worried about form factor, the 9 cell isn't for you).
     
  4. qwester

    qwester Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    366
    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    for what more you are getting for the $200 it is a reasonable deal, not great but reasonable. But if you don't need any of this extra stuff then why pay for it!

    note, if you decide you later want to get the 9-cell battery for example, it will cost you alone, around $150 (but you will have 2 batteries) ... so it is more of speculating about your needs.
     
  5. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    The recovery partition is not 8GB, more like 2-3. At least that is the way they were on mine. I have bluetooth and fingerprint reader on mine. It is nice not have to type in my password, but I don't think I'd pay extra for it. I also have a bluetooth mouse which I like. Since ThinkPad T series only have two usb ports, it is nice that I don't have to use one for the mouse.
     
  6. MP5

    MP5 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    it has 9 cell battery, i think the latter is cheaper.
     
  7. sparta.rising

    sparta.rising Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    well i'm suposed to have a 80gb hard drive, and the total space is only 70.5GB. And I think I remember when reformatting a T42 it was ~6GB
     
  8. qwester

    qwester Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    366
    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    an 80GB drive is actually 80,000,000,000 Bytes
    divided by 1024^3 = 74.5 GB

    So you are only losing 4GB since your reported capacity is 70.5GB

    As a rule of conversion: you aprox lose 7% of the reported capacity when doing the correct conversion, ie 1GB = 1024^3 Bytes. Since HDD manufacturer use 1GB=10^9 Bytes which is incorrect.