Looks like ATI still can't support OpenGL correctly, either on Windows or Linux:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38589
-
-
That's very very disappointing - especially since most of the new special window managers in Linux are using openGL in some form or fashion.
-
yeah, well, ATI's always had problems with OpenGL, either on Linux or Windows:
http://www.3dnature.com/ati.html -
What sucks is that most of business class notebooks use ATI.
-
-
What does ATI's poor OpenGL support mean to Beryl and Windows users such as myself? You can see from my signature that I'm not exactly running on the latest hardware.
-
Overall, probably not very much.
Beryl, for all it's eye-candy doesn't really tax modern GPUs that hard and you'll only use OpenGL under Windows if you're into 3D modelling/design or animation... In which case you're doubly screwed, since DX10 also borks OpenGL performance.
Let's hope AMD realise that full OpenGL support, alongside their proven track record with the Opteron in the workstation market, would allow them to dominate the linux 3D workstation market. -
-
Hopefully this is a sign of things to come from AMD. Linux users have always supported AMD, it's time they gave something back. -
My issue with it is that ATI just isn't OpenGL friendly, Linux, Windows or anything. Their drivers are continually next to the worst in the industry (Goooo Intel!). They're a DirectX shop, and that's about it. Hence, why I stay away from them. I had decent performance under Linux and Windows with my Radeon 9600, but I was bit by that bug that I mentioned in the 3DNature press release above, and haven't really wanted to deal with them since.
-
ATI sucks. I had to do all the Eye-candy on my HP desktop instead. Using Nvidia. I will never buy a laptop again that uses ATI.
-
-
Hopefully. Until then, I'm still recommending NVIDIA cards for Linux users
ATI on Linux
Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by Pitabred, Mar 29, 2007.