The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Fedora or Ubuntu.

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by kclives, Apr 12, 2008.

  1. kclives

    kclives Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Both have new releases coming soon, and I will be dual-booting linux soon.

    I have used both before and both suit me, but do any of you recommend one to the other i.e. the pros and cons?

    Thanks
     
  2. Element

    Element Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    192
    Messages:
    537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I prefer Ubuntu just because .deb is better than .rpm imo.
     
  3. blackbird

    blackbird Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    584
    Messages:
    1,546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Well, I liked Fedora 8 as it had pulseaudio instead of alsa.

    Now the new release of Ubuntu has pulseaudio and much more

    Ubuntu wins hands down.
     
  4. wearetheborg

    wearetheborg Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,282
    Messages:
    3,122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Ubuntu, much better community support.
    For rpm based distro, you can give mandriva 2008 spring a try.
     
  5. Thomas

    Thomas McLovin

    Reputations:
    1,988
    Messages:
    5,253
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Or PCLinux OS, which is good.
    I like Ubuntu, just because of the deb package system & all of the support.
     
  6. blackbird

    blackbird Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    584
    Messages:
    1,546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    If your wireless is intel 4965 stay away from PCLinux
     
  7. Chetanji

    Chetanji Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have a Dell M1330 on order and will load either Fedora/Debian/SUSE or something new.
    On the last workstation I used Fedora 7 and enjoyed it.
    However, there was no support for NetGear Wireless Cards.

    It took me a week to get the wisdom necessary to bring several pieces of software together for the Wireless card to fire up.

    I brought this up as an example of needs. Do you know if Ubantu has any better support for the very unsupported wireless industry than Fedora did?

    I use PHP, MySQL, Apache Server as well as program in Java and C++ so these needs are Alpha important and does Ubantu support programming environments?

    Thanks for any input.
    Chetanji
     
  8. Proteus

    Proteus Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Linux support for wireless in general is dependent on the chipset of the wireless device. Atheros chipsets currently have the best support overall. Broadcomm chipsets are about the worst, and Intel chips can be problematic, though will work decently for "normal" use. If you are planning on using your netgear card it would help to know the specific model and revision, since chipsets often change even within the same model number.

    I have a Netgear WG511T pcmcia card which has an atheros chipset. I have used this card under Debian (Sarge/Etch/Lenny) and Ubuntu (Gutsy Gibbon/Hardy Heron), where it works flawlessly using the tried and true madwifi driver. When I tried the Fedora Core 9 preview, which uses the newer ath5k driver for atheros chipsets, the card would work but there were problems with frequent disconnects from my ap. I also had this same problem with the opensuse beta which also uses ath5k.

    Except for Java, which I have never touched from a programming perspective, I have used the other development applications you mention with no probem under Debian and Ubuntu.
     
  9. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I would have to say Ubuntu. Fedora 8 Core for me was rock solid, but wasn't windows network friendly (I have one) but I don't know about the new version. I use Kubuntu 8.04 btw. I think they are both extremely reliable for the casual user, i.e. you can download updates and don't have to worry about the system going screwy :eek: :cool:

    Mandriva Spring is the Cat's A$$ :D I had a virtualbox glitch and had to ditch it, shame. That will be fixed in time, so if you don't need VB non free edition (VB OSE works fine from the repos) then definately check it out. EDIT: non free VB worked fine for others, there was something going on with my hardware somewhere, or/ could have been a setting, but myself and a few others couldn't find it..YMMV
     
  10. lemur

    lemur Emperor of Lemurs

    Reputations:
    524
    Messages:
    1,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    To complete Proteus' response: programing Java in Ubuntu is not a problem. The entire JDK can be installed easily and you can install Eclipse for a Java-oriented IDE.