The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Linux Server

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by koryo, Nov 2, 2006.

  1. koryo

    koryo Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I've been looking for a version of linux to use as a server and was wondering what you recommend. I've been looking at using OWL but since I have no experience with linux as a server wanted to know what kind of suggestions I could get.
     
  2. Lysander

    Lysander AFK, raid time.

    Reputations:
    1,553
    Messages:
    2,722
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I have no experience of running linux as a server, but the Ubuntu forums are immense so if you went that path I'm sure you could get help with any problems you happen upon.
     
  3. TedJ

    TedJ Asus fan in a can!

    Reputations:
    407
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Ubuntu has a rather nice server edition of the 6.06 release which should do the trick, otherwise I'd suggest going with Debian stable. Both are easy to set up for unattended security updates.
     
  4. Mr. Foolish

    Mr. Foolish Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    We use RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) at work, mainly due to the long product support cycles and their proven track record. The RedHat network is a nice way to do simple remote administration without the need for ssh. Almost everything is compatible with RedHat, in many cases software is packaged specifically for it or tested specifically on it. Also, hardware vendors are likely to support it over any other distro (Dell comes to mind here). Basically it's a good choice when the application is what matters and the OS just needs to work.

    There's a no-cost version in the form of CentOS which is good for low-value servers or for test systems, or for cheap sysadmins. :)

    RHEL is not a good desktop, though, and while it does have its share of configuration GUIs, they're not all that good. For these reasons it may not be the most comfortable distro for someone who is new to Linux server administration. I'm also not sure I'd recommend RHEL right now since a new version should be released any time now.
     
  5. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    What KIND of server, though? File server? Web server? Quake 3 games server? It matters ;)

    But in general I'd suggest going with a server-type install of Ubuntu, as it has one of the best communities out there and will really help you. Just get the alternative install ISO, rather than the LiveCD, and install a server version from that.
     
  6. Riscebiznass

    Riscebiznass Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=smeserver

    Works out of the box, plenty of addons, built on CentOS. Install takes about 15 min. Includes dhcp, firewall, squid, clamav, web, mail and all the stuff you need for a server. Give it a shot and see what you think.
     
  7. koryo

    koryo Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks for the input. I think I'm gonna try out Ubuntu server first since I already have the cd for it. I'll try out a few others later on.
     
  8. mitchmcse

    mitchmcse Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Ubuntu also has a lot of support out there if you run into any issues.
     
  9. Ethyriel

    Ethyriel Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    207
    Messages:
    1,531
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    You might check out Ebox. I believe it's Debian based, but from what I hear, it's front ends are very complete and make administration simple.
     
  10. AlexMagik

    AlexMagik Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i use debian and opensuse, i've a fedora as server, but seems unstable.
    debian is running flawless for a couple of years, opensuse 10.1 is a few months...

    all depends what server you need and what is for..
     
  11. Ditig

    Ditig Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    koryo, Linux doesn't really seperate between desktop use and server use. In 95%+ of the cases, it's the same kernel under the hood (although products such as RHEL sacrifice cutting edge features for stability). It's not like Windows where you have: Home, Home Premium, Professional, Server, Advanced Server, DataCenter and the OS determines if you can run a service on your machine or not and if so, how many connections it can handle. No. On Linux, you can basically do whatever you want. I can run a mail server, web site, e-commerce site, file server, backup server, HIDS, NIDS, proxy server, etc. all on my laptop on my stock installation without having to get RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu server, etc.

    However, if you're planning on running a server in a mission-critical environment or where you have people connecting 24x7, it's worth considering using CentOS or Ubuntu server or Debian stable.