I have looked through this thread and has not found a list like the other one in the Windows Free software list in the other thread. Do we have one here for LINUX?
grazzt
-
Uhm... by definition, the vast majority of linux software is free (open source), so that list would be.... massive, and pointless.
If there was a list of packages that people found exceptionally useful or better than the rest it might be cool, but even then everyone needs/wants different things from their distro. -
There must be a Top set of applications that must haves?
-
There you go
Debian -- Software Packages in "sid"
(warning: size=1.2MB) -
There was a few attempts, but it's quite pointless.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I started to work on one a while ago but didn't get around to finishing it. I might start it back up again, though I'm not sure if it's worth it.
-
The general problem with "must-have lists" is that they assume that everybody has the same requirements, which is not true - not only but especially on a highly configurable system like GNU/Linux/whatever.
If we start at the application level one could assume that everybody needs a mail client. This isn't the case. I don't have one. One could also say that everybody needs a webbrowser. I know nobody who doesn't use one on his desktop or laptop, but I know some people who are very happy with lynx, which would be awkward for most others. Most Linux users use OpenOffice or a derivative of it. I don't. Abiword and Gnumeric are sufficient for my needs but that doesn't go for everybody. And while many people might prefer text editors like gedit or kate I prefer vim (it happens quite often that my code contains waste colon sequences when I use another editor).
If we start at the desktop level, well there's KDE, Gnome, Xfce and LXDE. None of them is a must-have. I know a lot of Debian users who only use a simple window manager. And one of the lynx-users I had in mind doesn't run an x-server at all.
Ok, the Kernel: Linux is not a must-have. Some Debian and Gentoo users actually use a FreeBSD kernel, and I might be one of them after the next Debian release.
The idea of must-haves simply doesn't work with Linux. And even when I still was a Windows user some years ago I found this idea pretty strange.
It might only be me but i always found the idea of telling others what good software is to be patronizing. I'm pretty sure it isn't intended to be this way but if one just throws a software name at me without mentioning alternatives and discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the alternatives that's exactly the impression I get.
Something that goes through my mind whenever I visit a website of a computer vendor: -
Here's something similar from the Arch Linux forums. The Light 'n' Fast awards:
2009
2010
2011 (Still voting)
Instead of just looking for
List of software like the "ever growing list..."
Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by grazzt, Mar 26, 2011.