The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Which notebook for Ubuntu?

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by eKrzys, Aug 18, 2009.

  1. eKrzys

    eKrzys Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I am thinking about buying one of those small/portable notebooks with very (very!!!) long battery life and install ubuntu. One of my choices are Asus 1005HA-P or Toshiba mini NB205, as they are listed as a 8+ or 9+ hrs of battery life. Any ideas/feedback from forum members?
     
  2. Gintoki

    Gintoki Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,886
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
  3. The Fire Snake

    The Fire Snake Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    426
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Ubuntu will give you less battery life than windows. Thats why I am sticking with Vista on my laptop.
     
  4. Gintoki

    Gintoki Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,886
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Huh? Citation needed.
     
  5. neilnat

    neilnat Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    255
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  6. steve p

    steve p Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    156
    Messages:
    643
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Just Google it. It seems like most everyone in the various forums is reporting better battery life under Windows.

    http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=333067

    EDIT: it seems I was a bit slow!
     
  7. Gintoki

    Gintoki Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,886
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Citation confirmed, statement is valid.
     
  8. pixelot

    pixelot Notebook Acolyte

    Reputations:
    3,732
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Dells and Thinkpads are good... either of those would be a good choice if you need to install it yourself.

    Cheers... :)
     
  9. joeelmex

    joeelmex Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    229
    Messages:
    518
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Asus are good too.
     
  10. Th3_uN1Qu3

    Th3_uN1Qu3 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    214
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Yeah, if you'd ask me now, i'd go with Asus.

    As for the battery life thing, it depends how much time are you willing to spend to get it right. My DV5 lasted the same under Ubuntu and Windows, but it did take a day to configure properly. Also HD Video was much better under Ubuntu and it took less CPU resources, thus i could watch a whole movie on the measly 6-cell. However i went back to Windows due to a bunch of other issues.
     
  11. zephyrus17

    zephyrus17 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    646
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Yeap. I'd support Asus or Thinkpads (*hugs* T61p)

    In general, though. I think all modern notebooks WITHOUT broadcom wireless chips are pretty easy to set up. Broadcom isn't bad, it's just a bit tedious to get it working.
     
  12. pixelot

    pixelot Notebook Acolyte

    Reputations:
    3,732
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Actually, I've really had it quite easy with Broadcom, but yeah... maybe not optimal. :p
     
  13. zephyrus17

    zephyrus17 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    646
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    You've had to use that ndiswrapper thing? Well it's certainly not as easy as just downloading an intel "iwlwifi-4965-ucode" driver and that's it.
     
  14. pixelot

    pixelot Notebook Acolyte

    Reputations:
    3,732
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Nope. :)

    It's a proprietary driver. In earlier versions I had to manually choose to use it, but it was already downloaded. In Jaunty it's in use by default. Really quite simple. :rolleyes:

    Now I'd prefer it were a better card, from Intel or Cisco or so on, but this particular card is actually even supposed to support packet injection and the like. So I can't complain too much about having to use Broadcom. :D
     
  15. archer7

    archer7 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    647
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Mmmmm... aircrack + hping = happy me
     
  16. zephyrus17

    zephyrus17 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    646
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Wow.. Broadcom really responded to the negative response. I like that in a company. Public awareness.
     
  17. Th3_uN1Qu3

    Th3_uN1Qu3 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    214
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Yeah, i tried Ubuntu just for kicks on my dv9700 as well and the Broadcom wifi had exactly zero issues. It just worked out of the box. It's useful for a bit of aircrack every now and then... :D
     
  18. archer7

    archer7 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    647
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You could just run BackTrack off live, you know. It has a boatload of ha- ehrm... security auditing tools. Plus it doesn't take up HDD space.