The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Xorg-Edgers

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by theZoid, Nov 14, 2009.

  1. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    I added this ppa repo to my sources.list, upgraded and my glx gears went from ~2870 to ~4880. This repo was recommended on the Ubuntu Forums for possible performance improvements. It's Xorg, so beware. (I've used it before with 9.04 and never had problems, Nvidia Quadro that time)

    Code:
    ## Bleeding Edge Xorg
    deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/xorg-edgers/ppa/ubuntu/ karmic main
    deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/xorg-edgers/ppa/ubuntu/ karmic main
    the key:

    Code:
    sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 8844C542
    FWIW...I'm using Karmic 9.10 x64 on this Dell Vostro 1220 with an Intel x4500HD graphics card.
     
  2. zephyrus17

    zephyrus17 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    646
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    How's the performance increase? Any issues?
     
  3. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
  4. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Sames results with Xubuntu x64 9.10. Added the repos on this Vostro, glxgears went Up from 3600 to 4800-5000. In Mint 32 (RC1) I was getting 2400 without the repos, and 2800 with. Mint 32 was a real dog for some reason, don't know how much was due to 32 bit though but it was incredibly slow on this machine. Can't see why it would be so much different that Ubuntu 64 9.10.