The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    iozone3 - Filesystem and Disk Benchmarking Tool

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by szandor, Aug 8, 2008.

  1. szandor

    szandor Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    66
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i was looking for some sort of benchmark tool to compare the raid 0 setup on my 1720 and ran into iozone. i imagine once you figure out all the capabilities, or even some, it can become pretty useful. so far i've only played around with read/write stuff but i like how the output is ready for surface graphs in excel. anyone else running linux/iozone on a 1720?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. archer7

    archer7 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    647
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Looks like a great app. Unfortunately, it's not in the Arch repos (yet :D). It might be nice to do a comparison between iozone and phoronix-test-suite for disk benchmarking.

    What do you think of iozone's accuracy, and have you done any comparisons between the different filesystems?
     
  3. szandor

    szandor Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    66
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    so far i've only run iozone and bonnie++ on my raid 0 for the 2 drives in my ubuntu 1720. the results between the 2 for read/write & re-read/re-write are comparative but iozone seems to be more accurate. well, from visual comparison. bonnie++ is just a line of text whereas iozone gives multiple lines to create graphs all in one shot. i've been comparing them to a friend's raid 1/0 and single drive set ups (windows/ubuntu/fedora) and just from raid 0, in regards to read/write stuff, the performance is definitely noticeable/benchmarkable. we get around the same results depending on what we're looking at, more so when hitting the larger file sizes. benchmarking can get complicated with iozone with all the options but there's useful documentation out there. i'd really like to find another 1720 to compare with that's only using raid 1. or just 1 drive. or even raid 0 just to compare with mine. i'll have to check out phoronix. they even have a nice little .deb package ready. i like how ubuntu makes me lazy :D
     
  4. szandor

    szandor Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    66
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    forgot to mention i'm going to get mondo working with imaging/restoring raid on another raid set up first. mondo works great with single disks and even lvm but want to test it out on something first for raid. after that, i was going to look into raid with ext3 indexing enabled and at some point reiserfs.