The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    light weight linux options?

    Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by coldmack, Nov 24, 2009.

  1. coldmack

    coldmack Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I would like to know what my linux options are in the light weight category? I have tried crunchbag linux 64bit and its pretty good with its live cd. However, I want to see what other options are there. I am mainly looking at something that is not necessarily small in size, but faster on speed. Thanks.
     
  2. v1k1ng1001

    v1k1ng1001 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    239
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Depends on how fast you want to go. Linux is modular so you can take your favorite distro and install open box, lxde, icewm or whatever super lightweight desktop you want.

    If you are an ubuntu fan you might consider installing a fast desktop on top of the alternate install cd.
     
  3. coldmack

    coldmack Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Well Crunchbag is ubuntu(openbox interface) based and it was pretty good, and I am more familiar with Ubuntu based distro's right now. I just want to see other light weight options like Crunchbag.
     
  4. wearetheborg

    wearetheborg Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,282
    Messages:
    3,122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Debian should also be pretty good, if you do a bare install, then just pick and choose the windows managers etc that you want.
     
  5. Gregory

    Gregory disassemble?

    Reputations:
    2,869
    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    If you have the time to spare you may want to try actually installing Crunchbang. In my experience it was tremendously faster installed to the HDD than running from the live CD.

    Another option is Puppy Linux. I haven't tried 4.3 yet, but 4.2 was a great little OS. This isn't associated with Ubuntu.
     
  6. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Antix 8.x, it's debian based and pretty good...I've used it. It's part of the MEPIS community....it gives you Fluxbox and Icewm to choose from initially.
     
  7. coldmack

    coldmack Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Puppy looks pretty good, and have to sample it as the interface looks a little more robust. If its debain based does that mean I can install ubuntu deb files?

    Also, anyone know if Slaxs is any good?
     
  8. v1k1ng1001

    v1k1ng1001 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    239
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    slax is supposed to be a live cd only
     
  9. xuiojcvsa

    xuiojcvsa Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Its related to relational database You will have to read RDMS to understand this
     
  10. coldmack

    coldmack Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    So right now its down between Puppy Dog and crunchbag linux. After using Ubuntu MIE that HP included in their netbook, which will I be more better off with? What is \the general consensus on which is better to use.
     
  11. v1k1ng1001

    v1k1ng1001 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    239
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Load both onto a usb stick and try them out.
     
  12. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    If you're used to Ubuntu, then you'd feel more comfortable with a Ubuntu/Debian distro like Crunchbang, or even Antix. I'm the same way...I can't seem to stray from Debian for long.
     
  13. coldmack

    coldmack Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Thanks, I think I am gonna go with x64 of Crunchbag. Just two questions, I can install Xfce as the interface? Another questions is, I am pretty sure I can install this on a 2gb SD card. But, not sure if I can boot from via the SD card slot, or am I suppose to use a usb card reader to boot?
     
  14. coldmack

    coldmack Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    How does Xubuntu compare Crunchbag?
     
  15. Daevien

    Daevien Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Modifying Crunchbang to use XFCE would be possible, but a bit redundant in my opinion as other ubuntu based distros do that already.

    I've been using Crunchbang for a while now on a Toshiba U200 (nothing killer, 1 gig of ram, 120gb hd, dual core 1.7) but since I constantly get bored and have to reformat / tinker with something and my other main laptop was full of files, I got bored and reformatted the Toshiba and put on Linux Mint, the Community Edition with XFCE last week. http://www.linuxmint.com/rel_gloria_xfce.php

    It works very well so far and I'd add it to your list of things to try for being Ubuntu & XFCE based. You can get Firefox 3.5 through apt-get (defaults to 3.x) & I installed terminator as well (very handy terminal program) but besides that it's mostly the default install I'm using as my very portable & easy to shove in a corner system for doing tech work (backups, troubleshooting, downloads, connecting to my servers, IM & email, etc).

    Another one if you want to get more into doing the setup exactly how you want that I'd consider is ArchLinux ( http://www.archlinux.org/). It will take longer to setup and as it's a rollign release, if you update a lot you could run into issues if you aren't careful or need to do mission critical stuff.

    Oh, I forgot to mention that I used to use Xubuntu but for some reason I just didn't care for it as much as some of the other options, can't really ptu a finger on why though.
     
  16. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Xubuntu was very fast on my 12 inch Vostro in sig. I ended going to 'straight' Ubuntu Studio because of problems with my DropBox and CXOffice. Xubuntu is a great distro this time around for sure.
     
  17. v1k1ng1001

    v1k1ng1001 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    239
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yup, xubuntu is pretty nice on the netbook. I install the lxde desktop if I want some extra snort for flash video and such.

    Mint xfce is lighter than xubuntu but I am waiting for it to be based on 9.10 so that I can enjoy the benefits of having the updated intel graphics driver.
     
  18. theZoid

    theZoid Notebook Savant

    Reputations:
    1,338
    Messages:
    5,202
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Yep...they do a great job with Xfce...I'd always thought Xfce should be their (Mint's) main distro.
     
  19. coldmack

    coldmack Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    How is Mint XFCE on speed vs the others? I like the look and feel of Mint but not sure how this XFCE build is on speed.