I don't think this was ever answered properly. Running from a live CD (like Knoppix) is pretty risk-free. If you install it on your hard drive and want to keep Windows, you'll have to repartition, moving data around to make room. There's always some chance of screwing up when doing this--you NEED to make backups first. I hope all install guides have this instruction...
No one's yet mentioned the biggest reason I use Linux: I really like the freedom of having all the source code to everything running on my computer available. If something's broken, I can go out, figure out what's going wrong, and fix it, at least in principle and if the hardware vendors aren't hiding their information. BTW, this is why your ATI card does not have good support under Linux--ATI doesn't release the information necessary for the X.org developers to write a driver. nVidia does the same thing, though reputedly they do a somewhat better job writing their own driver. Both drivers still cause unfixable bugs.
-
ATI hasnt released its driver under GPL for developers/linux community to use. Nvidia on the other hand did release their driver to open-source. That is why their drivers are years ahead of ATIs. Its because they have linux developers helping the nvidia linux software programmers.
Moral of the story. Avoid ATI video cards in linux. -
Of course, I'm more than happy to be corrected on this one... just provide me a link to the current nVidia GLX source code. -
Thus, unlike ATI who keeps their own drivers to themselves, Nvidia gives the Xorg devs change/suggest certain aspects of the code.
Even that little bit of outside input has made the nvidia drivers evolve into drivers almost as good as their windows counterparts.
Cant say the same of ATI. -
The x.org wiki refers to the 'nvidia' driver as being proprietry, and in their schedule for FOSDEM2006 from last February, there was a talk on "Towards open source 3D acceleration for nVidia cards," by Stephane Marchesin from the DRI project. This suggests an open source version may be forthcoming, but it's not here yet.
I would also point you towards sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3 of the nVidia software license, in particular the prohibition on reverse engineering and binary modifications.
I will be the first to agree that nVidia has been more cooperative with the free/oss community than ATI, but their drivers for the moment remain their own.
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, it's not the politics of it that really concerns me anyway... nVidia's linux drivers just work better. -
-
No problem, DJ... it's not like I'm a babbling, bearded zealot like RMS. "Free" and "Open" are words I've learned you need to use very carefully in the linux world, they carry a lot of baggage. I'm genuinely a real fan of big green, they've shown quite an enlightened attitude towards the free/oss community.
I vaguely remember an interview with one of the guys at nVidia a while back regarding their linux drivers. From what I understand, they'd like to open source their drivers, but are constrained by licensing issues with some 3rd party code.
I'd like to thank you again for the other advice you've given me since I joined this forum, and officially annouce that this thread is back "on topic."
which distribution of Linux do you use?
Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by _radditz_, Apr 11, 2006.