The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    MSI GT60 0ne vs GT60 Dominator. Which one has more bang for buck?

    Discussion in 'MSI' started by gust0007750, Mar 23, 2014.

  1. gust0007750

    gust0007750 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    96
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    31
    MSI GT60 0NE: I7 3630qm, 12 GB ram, 750gb 7200rpm, Blu-ray burner 1341$
    GT60 dominator:i7 4800mq,8gb ram,750gb 7200rpm Dvd R-W 1400$
    Which one gives more bang for the buck?
     
  2. charliex3

    charliex3 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Dominator because of newer graphics and CPU :) RAM is not a problem and also that blu-ray burner...
     
  3. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I assume this is 680M vs 870M?

    The dominator will be a little faster in all regards and offers more features.
     
  4. Support.3@XOTIC PC

    Support.3@XOTIC PC Company Representative

    Reputations:
    1,268
    Messages:
    7,186
    Likes Received:
    1,002
    Trophy Points:
    331
    My vote is the Dominator as the ONE is now 2 gens old.
    Dominator > 2OC > ONE
     
  5. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    More like half a generation if you take true chip gens into account but *shrug*
     
  6. gust0007750

    gust0007750 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    96
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Frankly guys, it seems both investments have flaws, the 870m is according to 3d mark 11 graphics 19.56% higher than 680m and 16% in combined 3d mark 11,notebookcheck says its just under 680mx which is 15-25% higher than 680m but what some may not realize is that the 870m is the highest clocked kepler card even compared to 880m, now with these extremely unprecedented clocks the 870m might perform greatly for an hour even 3 hours but what happens if it runs for 6 or even all day for hard core gamers it will eventually throttle to decrease the heat but the 680m reaches similar performance effortlessly without producing that heat because it is under clocked making it more suitable for longer uses.. now performance over a long period of time is not a benchmark and therefore it is often ignored..Anyway I have a huge amount of respect for you Meaker, and Hutsady and please provide input on the whole performance under long hours of gaming and whether it is valid or not.
     
  7. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Well the dominator 464 has a 1080p ips display too (which no one is talking about for some reason) which is a huge plus.