The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Windows Zero Confirguation

    Discussion in 'Networking and Wireless' started by JWBlue, Mar 12, 2008.

  1. JWBlue

    JWBlue Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    85
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    31
    What are people's experiences with using Windows Zero Configuration as opposed to the utilites that come with their wireless adapters?
     
  2. SpeedyMods

    SpeedyMods Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    167
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I have no idea if it is more or less reliable, but it's all I use and I find it much more user friendly than the bundled software.

    Greg
     
  3. blue68f100

    blue68f100 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,020
    Messages:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I have all ways used WZC over mfg utility. I ran into some bad preset/defined rules that you could not disable with MFG utilities.
     
  4. kegobeer

    kegobeer 1 hr late but moving fast

    Reputations:
    836
    Messages:
    3,682
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    With XP, I would use the manufacturer's utility. However, in Vista, I've found WZC much more efficient. In fact, wireless reconnects much faster after resuming from sleep/hibernation.
     
  5. Crimsonman

    Crimsonman Ex NBR member :cry:

    Reputations:
    1,769
    Messages:
    2,650
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    What Kegobeer said. XP's WZC is really bad. I don't like it at all. But Vista's is really good (and a lot easier)