The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 (for PC & Mac) - $119.99 (AfterCode) Shipped at newegg.com

    Discussion in 'Notebook and Tech Bargains' started by Cin', Jul 23, 2011.

  1. Cin'

    Cin' Anathema

    Reputations:
    14,217
    Messages:
    15,406
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    466
    at newegg:
    Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 for both PC and Mac - $119.99 after code and free shipping

    Use this code: ADOBE723



    LINK:

    Newegg.com - Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3

     

    Attached Files:

  2. Generic User #2

    Generic User #2 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    so...can something like this be used for editing camera phone photos to reduce noise?
     
  3. ViciousXUSMC

    ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    11,461
    Messages:
    16,824
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Yes, but a bit overkill :D

    Camera phone pics are so low quality to start with using Lightroom to fix a phone pic would be like renting a tractor to fill in a hole your dog dug in the back yard.

    Try a free alternative first like Gimp and see if that can do the job.

    That said Lightroom 3 does have one of the best noise reduction algorithms out there right now, also a little known fact that Adobe Camera Raw that comes with photoshop is 90% identical to lightroom it has most of the features just in a different package that is sort of hidden from most users. I know it uses the same noise reduction.
     
  4. Generic User #2

    Generic User #2 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ah, thanks. only sorta related, but do noise reduction algorithms work better with high pixel pictures?
     
  5. ViciousXUSMC

    ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    11,461
    Messages:
    16,824
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    466
    More pixels = more data available so I would say yes.

    There will be diminishing returns at some point, and you dont want to crank a PNS (point and shoot) camera to max resolution just for the sake of thinking it will edit better because often the image sensor in a cheap camera is not really suited for the highest resolution it can take pictures so it will induce more noise to the picture in the first place than a lower resolution would.
     
  6. Generic User #2

    Generic User #2 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ah thanks. i was just asking because I was told that noise is a function of ISO and resolution. Assuming it was true, i was wondering if it would be worth it on the lower end cameras to:
    1) sacrifice resolution to reduce noise
    2) use full resolution to get more data for post processing(hence my question to confirm this idea)
     
  7. ViciousXUSMC

    ViciousXUSMC Master Viking NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    11,461
    Messages:
    16,824
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Yeah the answer is a mix of both. Just depends on equipment.

    If the sensor sucks larger images dont gain more detail so it just makes a larger file for no reason.

    Lowest ISO possible is the best way to get your original picture to have the least amount of noise, but then you may induce blur if your not using a tripod or have enough light to keep a good shutter speed (also most camereas on auto will turn the aperture really wide and this can cause loss of sharpness and you wont get to focus range you want)