Home Skillet....now you have been smoking the doobies. You are praising the goodness of notebooks that haven't even hit the states yet. The only thing Asus has that comes close to the MBP in terms of power and portability is the W3J. The V3J has a ****py video card (geforce 7400). You don't even know what the W3J clocks its video card at. Since the W3V had serious heat problems (my friend owns one and likes it but for that reason) I wouldn't be suprised if they don't underclock the stock as well. It also has no DVI port , which is a deal killer for me. It also has a smaller screen, less resolution, is thicker, and....all that for the same weight as the MPB. Now I love Asus, but at least support a machine you have actually held with your own hands.
PS...I second Valkyr comments.
PPS...I almost bought the W3J so it's not like I don't think Asus puts out the goods. I just like my machine just fine.
-
-
It's close, but a bit more power hungry -
Hmm...
Doesn't the 2.0GHz Core Duo model come with 256MB VRAM, not 128MB? -
-
Hey new to this forum but just purchased the MacBook Pro and have a few questions for those who also own:
1) Does your macbook get hot??
2) Does your macbook make a high pitched noise??
Just curious as to whether or not this is normal - if not I will take it back and get a replacement.
Thanks! -
Anyway, crazyguy, have you had any experience with shutting the laptop, and using it as a desktop with an external mouse/keyboard/monitor?
Please advise.
Thanks for the awesome review, and this gives me a valid excuse to get an Apple based computer again.
-defsquad -
I have a 2.8GHz desktop P4 with 1GB DDR400 and a 256MB 9800XT ATI. It puts out a similar Pi score to the MBP, but in WoW with everything on maximum, it can definitely bog -- It has everything to do with where you are and what's going on around you. I have a feeling this system will show at least a little slowdown in, say, a heavy melee in Alterac Valley.
Furthermore, some folks' Mac 'evangelism' factor here seems a tad high. Yes, it's sleek, yes, it's quiet and light. Build quality? I'm on the fence with Apple considering their history with batteries, heat, screens and iPODs. As for 'pimp' - huh? How can folks be dismissive of raw performance for games or biz and so hooked on a glossy white coating or a light-up Apple?
Thing is, my girlfriend's new $1260 (shipped w/ tax) E1705 trumps the MBP performance wise (dead quiet, too), at the cost of .6" thickness and 2lbs. I think that this really boils down to image-conscious... People just want to be seen with a slick looking Apple and are willing to convince themselves they don't 'need' better performance or that it 'does what I want just fine', even if it's over a grand more than a more powerful or specced Wintel note. So then you're paying for a look and for OSX, basically. And before the Apple fans pack their warchests, I'll be the first to say OSX trumps WinXP for everyday ease of use, stability and aesthetics. I just don't think it warrants a $1000+ premium and it doesn't have the best software support.
Boot Camp looks promising, though. With the inclusion of a more robust graphics adapter something like this could be worth switching for, maybe. And yeah, you do look snappy sitting in Starbucks with an Macbook. By comparison, my XPS makes me feel like I'm driving the note equivalent of a blinged-out pickup trick with chrome spinners and neon ground lights. -
I saw my mates mbp last night and oh my gosh it such a hot laptop talk about bling bling LOL I would know coz I'm a chick talk about smooth to the touch and the design it HOT! My mate had the biggest grin the whole night it was a huge compliment for him hehe
I;'m still tempted to get a toshiba but ill have 2 honest they r certainly not good looking laptops unbelievably conservative looking and they r made or hard plastic. They look so cheap and kinda tacky. To compare their designs 2 a samsung, apple and sony they fall right down the bottom for wot you have pay for them. But i guess looks are not everything.
One of my poor friends bought her mbp just a few weeks ago with the 1.83 ghz and now they have released a 2.0GHZ with same educational discount.
The only reason why im still incredibly unsure to purchase the mbp is that i use alot of auto desk software products eg AUTO, VIZ, MAX which r not compatible to macs system. I just dont understand why autodesk r so against using MAcs systems to support their programs as well. I also use adobe products which apparently they work better on apple mac system than windows.
But to know about bootcamp i guess its encouraging but still my instinct still tells me i should get another machine.
Has anyone here got a mbp and has install any of auto desk products and they still function normally without any gliches? I dont want to buy, install boot camp and windows and then auto cad and it doesnt function properly or it keeps crashing! Will they continually improve bootcamp? -
Autodesk doesn't develop for the Mac because it would cost them and they're not sure they'd see an adequate return. They would also have to expand their tech support and sales.
Adobe products don't 'work better' on Macs than they do on Windows. -
Thanks for the review, I was looking for a detailed review of the MBP, as I am in the same position as you. I am in the market for a laptop, but one that can play at least next generations games. I was really surprised to hear about the X1600 in the MBP, but saddened to hear that it was underclocked. You said that you overclocked yours, how did you?
-
PCMag's review of the 17" MBP is out:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1966472,00.asp
Apple MacBook Pro Review (pics, specs) Discussion
Discussion in 'Notebook News and Reviews' started by crazyguy, Apr 17, 2006.