Compal FL90, IFL90, FL92, JFL92 Benchmark Result

Please post your benchmark results online for the following notebook Compal (xFL9x) and make sure to complete the following information.

Vendor:
Model:
Version:
CPU:
Memory:
HDD:
VGA
VGA Driver:
OS:

--------------------------------------------------------------
Required Benchmark results.

3DMark06: free version, default settings
3DMark05: free version, default settings

--------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------
Optinal

wPrime: version 1.60 default settings
Windows Performance Index: with full details:
PCMark05: default settings

--------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
!!!!!OC IS ALLOWED BUT MAKE SURE AND PLEASE DO MENTION THIS!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------

For questions and extra's, please contact me by PM.

 

What is the use of wPrime, it seems to be a multithreaded benchmark tool, and our processors are dual cores, not multithreaded.

 

Check out this website for further information: http://www.wprime.net/about.html

 

Vendor: ORDI
Model: Enduro 7590BF
Version: IFL90
CPU: T7500
Memory: PQI 2x2GB DDR2 PC2-5300 4-3-3-11-25
HDD: HM250JI 250GB Samsung 5400rpm 8MB Buffer
VGA: Nvidia 8600M GT 512MB (hynix 2.5ns chips)
Driver: Forceware 171.23 WHQL
OS: Windows XP pre SP3 32bit
VGA Clock (raster/shader/mem) Defaults@OC: 475/950/400 @ 690/1630/504

3DMark06: Defaults 3430 (FW 174.53), Defaults 3280 (FW 175.80, Vista SP1 64bit), OC 4697
3DMark05: Defaults 6969, OC 9358
3DMark Vantage OC 1367
PCMark Vantage: -
PCMark05: -
wPrime: -
Windows Performance Index: 4.5

 

Thx for the update, I deleted my own result and will post a complete new version up to date.

 

I have Vista Business and I'm having difficulty to download all those testings tools, any idea?

Also, I think you should ask the members for their wisdom in terms of which are the best and more relevant testing tools. I have seen some sites using different tools and getting different results, certainly some tools are not good or accurate. May be there is a site talking about the best tools. Once everyone agrees on the tools then it will be easy to post meaningful results.

I will start a thread to fufill the objective above.

 

* Intel Turbo Memory (1GB): RD enable (387MB NVRAM), RB disable.
* RB: 2GB USB flash drive.


Vendor: RJTECH
Model: Compal FL90
Version: IFL90
CPU: T7700
Memory: Kngston 2x2GB DDR2 PC2-5300 5-5-5-15
HDD: ST9160823AS, 160GB 7200rpm 8MB Buffer
VGA: Nvidia 8600M GT 512MB
Driver: ForceWare 167.59
OS: Vista Business 32bit
VGA Clock Defaults@OC: 169/475/275

3DMark06: Defaults 3,296
3DMark05: Defaults 6,495
PCMark Vantage: 3,109
PCMark05: 5,840
wPrime: Cannot download it.
Windows Performance Index: 4.7

 

Just noticed Dirt is getting about 200 marks more than you Wirelessman, this is probably negligible, but you do have a faster CPU, i assume that he's got newer drivers than you so getting the extra marks over yours... it'll be interesting to see the range of 3DMarks people get... im interested in RePaRaQu results, as im intending to get a really similar spec.

 

Vista gets to be blamed for that.

 

Vendor: Zipzoomfly
Model: Compal FL90
Version:
CPU: T7500
Memory: Hynix 2x1gb ddr2-pc2-5400 5-5-5-15
HDD: Hitachi Travelstar 7k200 200gb 7200rpm
VGA: NVidia Geforce 8600m GT 512mb ddr2
VGA Driver: 174.74
OS: Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP2

3dmark 06@600/1200/400: coming soon.
3dmark 05@600/1200/400: 6319

wPrime 32m: 64.939s(2 threads)
Windows Performance Index:4.5

 

This is what I'm getting after a run the executable.

 

Hi Dirt, I notice that your display setup are higher then mine, 475/950/400 versus mine 169/475/275. Is this an XP feature or you also modified the defaults?

 

Those speed are the 2d mode speed.

 

Second mode of whom?

 

2D as in 2 Dimensions not 2nd. But it's weird my "standard 2d" clocks are: 169/338/100...

 

I know, 169 for 2D graphics, 475 for 3D performance and 275 for 3D Low power. These are the visual effects options, but believe me I have played with them but my WEI doesn't budge not even a little!

 

Since the wei is based on the lowest score you receive, the 4.6 you got is the vista aero score right? Overclocking the card doesn't change that or maybe you'de have to raise the clocks for the other 2 modes too... Aboout wprime, try running it as admin.

 

Yes it is my desktop windows aero. As I previously said, none of the visual effects impact the wei as it is supposed to (windows suggest to play with these options to imporve the wei).

The other lowest score (4.8), is on my RAM, which I'm too conservative to tweak it.

I always run as admin.

 

Whcih version of wPrime have you downloaded and or tested.

 

I tried the latest one, and since it didn't work, then I tried the one before, but didn't work neither.

 

Vendor: BTO Barebone (15W25+)
Model: Compal IFL90
Version:
CPU: T7500
Memory:2 * 1024 Kingston 667 mhz
HDD: Seagate Momentus 7200.2 200 GB
VGA: NVidia Geforce 8600m GT 512mb gddr2
VGA Driver: 174.16 beta
OS: Windows XP Pro 32 bit SP2


3DMark06: Defaults 3402, OC 4236 @ 650/1300/480
3DMark05: 8619 @ 650/1400/475
PCMark Vantage: -
PCMark05: 6503 @
wPrime 1.56(16 threads): 39.625, wPrime 1.60(2 thread): 64.828
Windows Performance Index: -

 

Weird because I tried launching it directly from the zip and it worked, but when I tried starting it from where I unpacked it it gave me the same message as you, but it eventually worked for no reason...

 

Vendor: Ultiwerk
Model: Compal FL90
CPU: T7500
Memory: 2x1024 Buffalo 666 mhz
HDD: Seagate Momentus 7200.2, 120 GB
VGA: NVidia Geforce 8600m GT 512mb DDR2
VGA Driver: 167.57
OS: Windows XP Pro 32 bit SP2
I'm running 1280x800 resolution

3DMark06: Defaults (1280x800) - 3786
3DMark05: Defaults (1024x768) - 6456

hm...

 

Core2Duo T7500
Compal IFL90 (965PM)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT 475/400 @ 680/1630/504
PQI 2*2GB DDR2 SDRAM Memory 667MHz (4-3-3-11)
Samsung 5400rpm 250GB

WinVista SP1 64bit, DX10, FW 175.12 (WHQL - Not FM Approved)

3Dmark Vantage 1367

 

Vendor: Forcebook
Model: Compal JFL92
Version:
CPU: T9300 2.5GHz
Memory: Kingston 2x1GB 667MHz
HDD: Seagate Momentus 100GB 7200.1
VGA: 8600M GT 512MB DDR2
VGA Driver: 174.70
OS: Win XP Home SP2 + Hotfix

Required Benchmark results.
3DMark06: 1280x1024 default 475/900/400 3477 - overclock 675/1350/500 4522
3DMark05: 1024x768 default 475/900/400 7076

Optional
wPrime: version 1.62(2 threads) 34.734s, version 1.55(2 threads) 34.702s
Windows Performance Index: N/A
PCMark05: -

--------------------------------------------------------------

Shouldn't I be getting better results in wPrime?

 

I don't think so you are pretty much on par with everybody else.

 

But if you check the Hardware subforum last few pages in this thread http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=123570 you can see that some T9300 got score of about 30s. hm