Card: Geforce 8600M GT 512 MB
System: Windows Vista Bussines
Bios:1.10
Drivers:XTreme-G MobileForce VS 101.70 M6
standard 475/400
on standard speed my result (in 3dmark06) was 2925 points
on overclocked settings
500MHz (core)/400MHz (Memory) the result reached 2980 point
after the test temperature was about 70 degrees C
on overclocked settings
530/430 i reached 3179 points
after the test temperature was about 75 degrees C
i used RivaTunet with Coolbits
screens;
![]()
![]()
-
after overclocked to 540/440
the result has increased to 3236 points
the temperature didn`t change -
Um, a bit disappointing? Or is this normal?
-
still not nearly as fast as the asus g1. I think I'm gonna go with the asus c90. hopefully I can get at least an hour from that running on the battery.
-
for me so disappointing results are because of the core 2 duo t7100 weakness
(you should have stronger processor for this graphics card) -
is the gap between the T7100 and T7300 that obvious?
Would it also be applicable to real life performance of games and such? -
If the performance was limited by the CPU, overclocking the GPU wouldn't change very much, like it does here.
The majority of the performance loss is from the extremely low clocked memory on the 8600M. -
570/450
max temp is 75 degrees C
max temperature didn`t change
530/430 to 570/450 its very good news -
Those are pretty good results compared to what the Compal IFL90/Stingray Z84 got. It got up to 545Mhz(core)/495Mhz(memory)
http://www.laptopspirit.fr/test-du-compal-ifl90stingray-z84/ -
if it was at 2.2 what u think it would put out
-
just click on Kdawgca's posted link
-
i've 3400 on 3d mark06 with a T7500 and 2Go Corsair.
-
Is that score for the IFL90 right? I run a 3927 on 3D Mark 06 @ stock speeds and I thought these 2 notebooks would perform about the same( with similar specs of course).
-
Yeah, but with a 7100 processor. The French review in kdawgs link got it close to your score but that was overclocking it of course. The IFL90 appears to be GDDR2 or seriously underclocked GDDR3, maybe both, I dunno
I thought fakes scores looked pretty good considering the processor he has in there.
-
True, I didnt consider the CPU he is using.
-
Please, make 3DMark05 result as default, 06 to much depends on CPU speed, so it's really difficult to compare.
-
can u state what the stock memory bandwidth is? you probably already said it, but i dont really understand to much bout garphic cards.
it seems that 8600gts come in either 12.8GB/s or 22.4GB/s. which one does the IFL90 come with? -
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9951704
i got 3590 with 490 core 460 mem -
^^ How were the temps with that?
-
How much ram do you have?
-
2xElixir 1GB 667 5-5-5-15
-
GPU: 570 MHz
Mem: 440 MHz
Vista Business 32bit (with many services running...
)
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9926909Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015 -
Um nice
... temps?
edit\\ I'm guessing that the WXGA screen made the benchmark run at lower resolution though =/ -
Temps near 79ºC.
Bench @ 1280x800
[[]]
Compal IFL90 Graphics Card OC results
Discussion in 'Other Manufacturers' started by fake, Jul 7, 2007.