The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Help me decide

    Discussion in 'Other Manufacturers' started by lafguy, Oct 23, 2006.

  1. lafguy

    lafguy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I'm going with either

    EX model because of 2 gb ram option and Nvidia GPU (My fav was SX but, Integrated video scared me off for 3d modeling)
    MX its a sweet machine too tough decision

    Which would be best for

    Office 2003 internet surfing and game design programming 3d modeling

    Thanks
     
  2. jas

    jas Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    697
    Messages:
    622
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    lafguy,

    This is my opinion only based on my research on these forums, and the Portable One website, along with Asus and Clevo websites, so please take this with a grain of salt. I don't own either, and I've not seen either laptop, (as P1 models or as Asus or Clevo models either) But I came very close to ordering the UX recently.

    In looking at the SX and UX online, I felt that the UX was a better built, higher quality, laptop. In terms of the computing platforms, they can come with almost identical CPU, RAM, HDD, etc. So in terms of what you want to use them for they both should work well. Maybe you could use the slightly larger screen of the SX, although right now you can get a Core 2 Duo in the UX only, and the UX supports slightly larger RAM capacity at 2gb versus the SX's 1.5gb.

    Finally, because you mentioned as your last requirement is 3d modeling, you may want to reconsider your options to include the MX as well. The reason I say this is because both SX and UX use the Intel integrated graphics processor, as opposed to the nVidia GPU used in the MX. You would not notice so much between and Intel and nVidia GPU, doing office stuff, internet surfing and maybe not even during game design programming. But you would notice a difference with 3d modeling, and certainly during game playing.

    Good Luck..

    BTW, I did recently order the new MX-A8JS, because I wanted the faster GPU. Otherwise I would have ordered the UX. I really like the form factor and build quality of that unit..
     
  3. lafguy

    lafguy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I'm deciding between EX and MX

    Which gets better battery life on max resolution?
     
  4. ivang

    ivang Company Representative

    Reputations:
    90
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The EX can achieve better battery life since it comes with a 9 Cell battery and has a smaller GPU. The MX has a higher resolution LCD, i.e. 1440 x 900 WXGA+, so if your doing 3D modeling the higher resolution display may be more beneficial for you.