The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Ordered my ifl90

    Discussion in 'Other Manufacturers' started by GffMaC, Jan 28, 2008.

  1. GffMaC

    GffMaC Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Hey Guys,

    I ordered my ifl90 on Friday and should be with my in 10 days.

    This is what I went for:
    15.4 INCH WIDESCREEN DISPLAY (1440 X 900) + ANTI-GLARE
    INTEL® Core 2 Duo T7800 (2 X 2.60GHz) 800MHz FSB/4MB L2 Cache
    4GB CORSAIR DDR2 667MHz - LIFETIME WARRANTY! (2x2GB)
    INTEGRATED BLUETOOTH ADAPTER
    250GB SERIAL ATA II HARD DRIVE WITH 8MB CACHE (5400rpm)
    512MB GEFORCE 8600GT + D-SUB + TV-OUT
    Onboard Gigabit LAN & WIRELESS 802.11N NETWORK CARD
    Biometric Fingertip Reader & 1 x Express Card Slot

    I need to start preparing myself and was wondering what people recommend going with XP or Vista?

    I have also read about people increasing their gfx performance a little and was wondering what software is the best for that.

    Also I will probably want to make sure Ive got all the latest drivers, bios etc.

    Any thoughts would be appreciated.

    Cheers
     
  2. Wirelessman

    Wirelessman Monkeymod

    Reputations:
    4,429
    Messages:
    4,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    With regards the OS, Vista is the new MS OS with many nicer features than XP, especially security and internet/network settings. The real question is; Vista 32 or 64? Then to my knoweldge, there not many applications for 64 platform, so I personally have Vista 32.

    Why did you chose such display, I think the general opinion is that you are better with an WSXGA+ matte (no glare).

    Your reseller should put the most recent drivers, request that they do it.
     
  3. GffMaC

    GffMaC Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks wirelessman,

    Yeh Im gonna go for Vista. RE the screen the company Im getting it from dont offer the choice of changing the screen. I actually like the glossy screen on my sons new imac but Im sure with a laptop on the move it may get annoying but I guess I will learn to live with it.
     
  4. Wirelessman

    Wirelessman Monkeymod

    Reputations:
    4,429
    Messages:
    4,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Glossy has sharper colors (perception) but it reflects too much light, so that's why I don't like it but your kids will like it, 1440x900 is very close to 1680x1050 anyway. Now be aware that your Vista 32 won't see the full 4GB of RAM, only Vista 64 can. You are better therefore with 3GB, however having the 4GB now you will be ready when you will decide to upgrade to 64.
     
  5. GffMaC

    GffMaC Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  6. Mippoose

    Mippoose Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    126
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    There is no point of getting 800mhz ram at this point.

    Although the processor has a 800mhz FSB I do not believe the data transfer rate will be able to go over 667mhz, do to the northbrige or whatever it is called.

    I heard this when Santa Rosa was released. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    But my opinion is that 667mhz will do what you need.
     
  7. vashts121

    vashts121 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    95
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Go with XP. You're not missing much by going to Vista, only loosing performance and the bland look of XP. As for software to improve performance, try Memset Beta (change your RAM timings), Notebook Hardware Control (make your processor run full speed 100% of the time) and RivaTuner (overclock your video card).
     
  8. Wirelessman

    Wirelessman Monkeymod

    Reputations:
    4,429
    Messages:
    4,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    1. DDR2 can theorically go up to 800MHz if the closk applied to it is 400MHz so 2x400MHz = 800MHz.

    2. DDR3 memory would work much faster (2x) but I beleive it won't work in a DDR2 mobo.
     
  9. Dirt

    Dirt Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    42
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    1) WinXP is not less secured the Vista.
    2) Looks are not the answer, but if you need them the Vista Transformation Pack is always out there.
    3) Windows XP doesn't virtualize every single thing in your computer so that nobody except OS itself could use it directly. You can't even measure video memory usage because of that, Creative can't write normal audio drivers with hardware acceleration and so on. I don't even know what was MS thinking when they come up with such a dumb thin. It's like JAVA virtual machine, and everyone knows how slow JAVA is.
     
  10. v1k1ng1001

    v1k1ng1001 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    239
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Running XP pro just fine. Obviously can't play DX10 games, but since I don't own any yet this isn't a big deal. I guess I'll wait until Vista is stable.

    I still haven't been able to get Ubuntu to work. I'm hoping that April's release will solve a number of problems I am having.
     
  11. Wirelessman

    Wirelessman Monkeymod

    Reputations:
    4,429
    Messages:
    4,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Yes, you are right, although the FSB is 800MHs the RAM processor cannot match that speed. The new Intel processor will get done with the Northbridge processor and will have the RAM processor built-in the same die permiting this way to reach the 800MHz.