The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Overclocking CPU / PLL Manufacturer??

    Discussion in 'Other Manufacturers' started by SailCat, Sep 30, 2007.

  1. Mana-Mana

    Mana-Mana Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    In last test version is not present lprs365bglf = \ it will not be probable ways software cpu overclock in the near future
     
    Mana-Mana, Dec 29, 2007
    #51
  2. mojooh

    mojooh Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    so there is no hope for the 9lprs365bglf ?? is it sure that it can not be programmed ?
     
    mojooh, Jan 14, 2008
    #52
  3. yotano211

    yotano211 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    63
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    bump for any new ideas
     
    yotano211, Feb 7, 2008
    #53
  4. tavara

    tavara Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Any news about Pll 9LPRS365BGLF
     
    tavara, Jun 20, 2008
    #54
  5. PBandeira

    PBandeira Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Not a sinlge hope on 9LPRS365BGLF?
     
    PBandeira, Jul 21, 2008
    #55
  6. Dirt

    Dirt Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    42
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I noticed an article on overclockers.ru regarding of removing a hardware lock on FSB, as I suspected from the very start. Here's translated version:
    http://translate.google.com/transla...stantin_n/record1&sl=ru&tl=en&history_state0=
    IFL90 should have very similar circuit, but unfortunately, this mod requires removing one of the resistors, and that is no go for me. I could tolerate extra wiring with electrically conductive glue, that can easily be removed, but not this.
     
    Dirt, Feb 22, 2009
    #56
  7. PBandeira

    PBandeira Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Seems that our search for easier ways of overclocking is not ended. If any one has further information, please post.
     
    PBandeira, Feb 22, 2009
    #57
  8. Dirt

    Dirt Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    42
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    PBandeira
    There won't be any easier way, it's hardware lock and only way to bypass it is to solder.
     
    Dirt, Feb 22, 2009
    #58
  9. User Retired 2

    User Retired 2 Notebook Nobel Laureate NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    4,127
    Messages:
    7,860
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Same problem here with a ICS9LPRS355 on a HP 2510P (and probably 6910P). There are also FSC, FSB, FSA signals that may be able to be tapped to hard set the CPU frequency. In my case it starts at 133, but can be 166, 200, 233, 266.. etc. Not as flexible as unlocking the PLL, but still a possibility.

    It should be noted that the trusted mode enabled pin also functions as a PCI2 signal after post. If hard setting it to disable the TME mode AND the board uses PCI2, then could be in another bother.

    EDIT: TME mode was overcome with ICS9LPRS355 and setfsb. Perhaps try that PLL and see if it works?
     
    User Retired 2, Mar 17, 2009
    #59
  10. yomamasfavourite

    yomamasfavourite Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    51
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Could you explain what you mean by that edit, please.
    Did 355 work for you, or are you saying that 355 also had the tme problem and that abo came up with a softweare workaround for that pll?
    Thanks.
     
    yomamasfavourite, Apr 20, 2009
    #60
  11. User Retired 2

    User Retired 2 Notebook Nobel Laureate NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    4,127
    Messages:
    7,860
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes - abo worked around it. There's a stack more info about dealing with TME enabled (no overclocking) PLLS and how to get around this limitation here.
     
    User Retired 2, Apr 20, 2009
    #61
  12. yotano211

    yotano211 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    63
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i have a HP 2510p with a 1.33 U-7700 1.33 cpu. i got my working at 1.6. any further and it crashes. and yes i use the 355 pll code.
     
    yotano211, Apr 24, 2009
    #62
← Previous page