I was checking out some Linux stuff and saw a post about 32bit being easier on the battery..
That you get more run time with 32bit.
Anyone do a comparison of Win7 32bit vs 64bit run time?
I am more curious about a CF19, due the the smaller battery, but I am interested in results for any Toughbook...
- 
 
 - 
 
toughasnails Toughbook Moderator Moderator
I can't see why it would be better. On my 19 MK5 W7 32BIT I get around 5-6 hours (screen set @ 70%) on a trip last year with GPS running..
 - 
 
I am not sure the real"quality" of my used batteries...My run time is not what I would expect it to be.
The poster said battery usage was higher due to more ram being used...More chips..more power..
I am sure one 4gb dimm would use less power than 2--4gb dimms. How much, I don't know. It may be insignificant.
It did make me curious though.. I imagine the CPU uses more power when running more processes, like a 64bit system does. - 
 
Haha, this topic sounds familiar.
 I was just posting on TBT about it when the server went down.
      - 
 
I figure two sites gives me a wider audience.
I noticed Rob's site was hanging up sometimes... - 
 
Yeah, something snapped just as I hit the Reply button.
 - 
 
you did it ..you broke it...it's your fault....
 - 
 
Yeah, I did click on the mouse a bit hard.
      - 
 
good thing you didn't drop it !
 - 
 
 That server was 32-bit...
 
32bit vs 64bit battery duration.
Discussion in 'Panasonic' started by Shawn, Jul 17, 2015.