The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Bluetooth internal 2.0 or external 4.0?

    Discussion in 'Panasonic' started by Kardan, Mar 7, 2015.

  1. Kardan

    Kardan Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    140
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    31
    If I remember correctly, the internal Bluetooth card in a CF-30 Mk3 is version 2.0.

    Toshiba and others make a USB Bluetooth dongle that is version 4.0 and is small enough to fit in one of the USB ports behind the rear docking bay door of the CF-30 -- and let the door close. I can see an advantage to having Bluetooth ver 4.0 over ver 2.0 but is there any advantage I am missing to the internal Bluetooth card over the external USB one (other than of course losing one USB port)?
     
  2. Shawn

    Shawn Crackpot Search Ninja and Options Whore

    Reputations:
    1,541
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    331
    internal BT has "large" dedicated antenna. USB.. BT must have tiny antenna, which will be obstructed by solid metal door.

    I think even though USB BT is 4.0 performance will suck..
     
  3. CWB32

    CWB32 Need parts for my flying saucer.

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    1,563
    Likes Received:
    412
    Trophy Points:
    101
    small antenna and obstructions ... an old amateur radio adage applies :
    "if ya can't hear 'em , ya can't work 'em" .
     
  4. BaRRmaley

    BaRRmaley Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    206
    Messages:
    1,451
    Likes Received:
    489
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Upgrade your internal Wi-Fi to Wi-Fi+BT. Best choice :)
     
  5. Kardan

    Kardan Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    140
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Thanks for the advice. Any particular upgrade board you'd recommend?
     
  6. Shawn

    Shawn Crackpot Search Ninja and Options Whore

    Reputations:
    1,541
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    331
  7. Shawn

    Shawn Crackpot Search Ninja and Options Whore

    Reputations:
    1,541
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    331
  8. BaRRmaley

    BaRRmaley Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    206
    Messages:
    1,451
    Likes Received:
    489
    Trophy Points:
    101
    I'm using Intel AC7260, it's very stable with modern drivers, but not as fast as my old Atheros AR9280 in my N-network. If you have AC-router - it will work very fast. Also AC7260's bluetooth is very good.
    I'm going to try this card
    Azurewave AW-CE123H / 802.11ac/n/b/g + Bluetooth 4.0 / Half-Size PCI-Express MiniCard
    You can start with it :)
    I think CF-30 Wi-Fi card is full-size, so you will need half to full size adapter bracket. They are cheap and available.
     
  9. gray-beard

    gray-beard Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    257
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    41
    This is my comparison between bluetooth 3.0 and 4.0.
    I mainly use bluetooth for streaming audio to a set of headphones.
    I stream from my phone, so your mileage may vary.
    My headphones are 4.0 compatible and my old phone (galaxy s3) was 3.0.
    Upgraded to a galaxy s5 last week and it is 4.0.
    There is a big difference in the fidelity. More highs and lows.