Has anyone tried using a compact flash card with adapter to IDE as a substitute for a HDD? Looks like the 16GB CF cards go for $42 or so online, much less than a true solid state drive. Seems it could be more rugged and less power hungry than a rotating HDD. Tried searching around NBR but nothing conclusive, just wondering if anyone here tried that yet?
-
-
I do not recommend the compact flash cards as they have unacceptable transfer rates
There is two or three forum members here that have ide type ssd drives in their Toughbooks though
I would like to know what they have used and what if any performance increase that they have found
The sata ssd drives that I use in my cf-19 and cf-30 have very good performance
Alex -
This has been discussed before... I think "NO" is the usual answer...
-
It might take a few minutes for Firefox to load off of a CF...
-
HI,
This is not the same but I use a 64 GB thumb drive to store my large mapping programs. It works great. Very fast.
My machine will not allow booting from a USB device so booting is not an option.
Sparky -
Yup -
Every month or two we have this same idea comes up; believe me, you're not the first. The general consensus (among those who've actually done it) is that it CAN be done... but for overall performance, a regular old IDE drive beats the setup all hollow.
Windows generally is pretty picky about it's swapfile; it needs BOTH fast random-access and fast sequential-access in that arena; flash memory cards (no matter what the format) simply aren't very good at BOTH at the same time. Yes, you CAN disable the swapfile; no, it's not a good idea, it causes more trouble than it's worth.
Your BEST use for unused flash RAM is as a ReadyBoost drive; it DOES make a good 4th/5th level cache device.
Once you've tried a REALLY GOOD and properly optimized SLC SSD, you'll understand why I tell you NOTHING LESS is worth the hassle; CF cards and MLC SSDs are CHEAPER FOR A REASON.
You want to run an adware kiosk or replace the HDD in your router cheaply? The CF adapter is a good choice. Otherwise, stick with the HDD or save up you shekels for a good SLC SSD. I'd much rather have a 32GB SLC than a 128GB MLC SSD; but remember too that unless you have a machine with SATA, you're not going to see the full potential of either drive, speedwise.
mnem
I got road rash on the Information Superhighway...
Compact flash for solid state drive?
Discussion in 'Panasonic' started by Springfield, Oct 15, 2009.