The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Gobi 5000 swap

    Discussion in 'Panasonic' started by r.wyll, Mar 27, 2019.

  1. r.wyll

    r.wyll Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I recently procured a CF-31 mk2 with Win 7, Gobi 2000, factory gps, and a 500 GB HDD. The machine is a lot quicker than my CF-31 mk3. I build cell towers for a living and use the hell out of my 3G WWAN. It is relatively fast. But I was wondering if a Gobi 5000 with 4G/LTE would be any faster. And if it is faster, what all besides the wwan card would be needed?
     
  2. Shawn

    Shawn Crackpot Search Ninja and Options Whore

    Reputations:
    1,541
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    331
    It is quicker in what way?
    Saying it is quicker is vague.
     
  3. r.wyll

    r.wyll Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I was wondering if it would make the upload/download of data any faster than the 3G network it runs off of now.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  4. Shawn

    Shawn Crackpot Search Ninja and Options Whore

    Reputations:
    1,541
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Download speed of 4g should be faster than 3g. On paper it is anyway.
    But my real question is, Why is a mk2 faster than a mk3?
    Are they both i5's?
    Maybe format and reload the mk3.

    To upgrade the WWAN, the card itself should be all that is needed. Get a real Panasonic card.

    I just did a search on your previous posts.
    I am guessing that the CF-31 mk3 was an error and you meant CF-30 mk3. That makes more sense.
     
  5. r.wyll

    r.wyll Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
    That was a typo by yours truly. Supposed to have read CF-30 mk3. I apologize for the big clods I call fingers! Typing on a phone is not one of my better qualities.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  6. SHEEPMAN!

    SHEEPMAN! Freelance

    Reputations:
    879
    Messages:
    2,666
    Likes Received:
    517
    Trophy Points:
    131