The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Toughbook - Why Ubiquiti Vs. Engenius for Hi-power Wifi

    Discussion in 'Panasonic' started by rick 10p, Nov 21, 2011.

  1. rick 10p

    rick 10p Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Toughbook,
    In another tread, you mentioned (and in your sig) that you use the Ubiquiti high power Wifi card. How or is this a better system than the highly refereed Engenius 8602+ & +S.
    I have the 8602+ installed in 2 CF-29's and they work great. But, will the "Ubiquiti" work the same or better in 1 or both of the CF-30's that I now have.
    "Alex" posted that you have the "SR71E" model, they only now list SR71-A & SR71-15 models.
    Info would be much appreciated
     
  2. ares93

    ares93 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    79
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I'm wondering about this as well. I'm getting a new card since the Intel 2915 is, well, crap. But i cant decide between the two.
     
  3. Alex

    Alex Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,081
    Messages:
    4,293
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    106
    The "E" type is still available from several sellers
    Rick has used this card for over a year and has yet to give us an idea if there was an improvement

    @rick 10p + @ares93 This card will not work on older Toughbooks as the cf-30 uses a m-pci-e interface

    So you have to look at other adapters for use in cf-18's/cf-29's

    We have many threads on the old m-pci wi-fi upgrades

    And quite a few on upgrading m-pci-e in the cf-30 , although they are all using Intel cards
     
  4. Shawn

    Shawn Crackpot Search Ninja and Options Whore

    Reputations:
    1,541
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    331
    I use this in my cf29 m-pci
    Mikrotik

    Mikrotik 350mw 802.11n R2N
    high power (350)mw and it has N. It uses a newer chipset.
    Atheros AR9223

    It works fine in my cf29
     
  5. rick 10p

    rick 10p Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    My CF-29's already have the Engenius 8602+ cards in and working extremely well.
    Shawn, thankx for the link. I did'nt know that there were so many choices of WifI cards available. Just trying to find a hi power WiFi solution for the 2 CF-30's, that work as well or better than what is in CF-29's.
    Still waiting for "Toughbook" to chime in and give us all a run down on his WiFi card.
     
  6. ares93

    ares93 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    79
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I meant the manufacturers, not specific card models. I know i don't have m-pcie in my cf-29, much to my dismay...

    Nonetheless, I hear engenius is more popular, yet they seem to preform much the same. There isn't much of a difference in the price either. Say the SR2 and the 8209+.
     
  7. Toughbook

    Toughbook Drop and Give Me 20!

    Reputations:
    1,267
    Messages:
    7,361
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    251
    I have used the Engenius wifi cards in the CF-28 and CF-29 for years and love them... But they are Mini-PCI cards. I needed a PCI-E card for the CF-30 and didn't even check to see if Engenius made the PCI-E cards. Someone at the time was crowing about the Ubiquiti so that is why I went with it.

    It beats the stock card but I have never compared it to the Engenius card. Next time I build a CF-29 with the Engenius card I'll have to compare and post back.