3DMark Released

download links posted in gaming thread > http://forum.notebookreview.com/gaming-software-graphics-cards/707365-3dmark-released.html

 

Thanks for the heads up and link, now lest do some testing!

 

slap my wrists for cross posting but as i mainly post on the clevo community ive added a link above as well (had to post this before the mods get on my back again )

full results NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx

iced storm NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P92933 3DMarks

cloud gate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P16238 3DMarks

fire strike NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P3810 3DMarks

now if only i knew what the scores meant

 

Here are my results with p170hmx, Intel 2630QM and light overclocked 6970m:

Iced Storm => AMD Radeon HD 6970M / 6990M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2630QM Processor,CLEVO P170HMx score: P83817 3DMarks
Cloud Gate => AMD Radeon HD 6970M / 6990M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2630QM Processor,CLEVO P170HMx score: P11977 3DMarks
Fire Strike => AMD Radeon HD 6970M / 6990M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2630QM Processor,CLEVO P170HMx score: P2341 3DMarks
Full Results => AMD Radeon HD 6970M / 6990M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2630QM Processor,CLEVO P170HMx

Greetings F1r3

 

Memory 2,048 MB
Core clock 925 MHz
Memory clock 1,200 MHz
Driver name AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Driver version12.100.17.0
Driver status FM Approved

87196 Ice Storm
2/4/13 9:53:40 PM
1Intel Core i7-3630QM ProcessorDetails Delete
AMD Radeon HD 7970M

16688 Cloud Gate
2/4/13 9:53:40 PM
2Intel Core i7-3630QM ProcessorDetails Delete
AMD Radeon HD 7970M

4621 Fire Strike
2/4/13 9:53:40 PM
3Intel Core i7-3630QM ProcessorDetails Delete
AMD Radeon HD 7970M

 

AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3740QM Processor,CLEVO P370EM

 

here is mine stock clocks for 7970m and 13.1 WHQL drivers!!

AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2720QM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

 

3610qm, 1050/1560, 13.2 beta4
88257/17753//5435
AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO P170EM

it seems enduro utilization problem has heavy impact on Ice Storm test. those without enduro like ailenware and clevo hm series all scored over 100000 in this test even at stock clock speed.

 

It seems like that littlecx, cause my old 6970m is very close to your scores - in gaming the 7970m should be around 75% faster ;D

 

Here is my result at stock clocks (graphics card) and an i7 970 overclocked as a 980x, just one card, cause my slave GPU just died. As soon as I have a slave again, the score will follow .

Spoiler

 

Enduro issues strike back. That is a bit worrying.

 

why u make worries about benchmark for smartphones?) ur Fire Strike scores are close to desktop gtx 670 from this tread.

my result:
default clocks:

Benchmark result
(i got clevo EM model too, and i can´t see any enduro problems)

1060/1550

SCORE 5529 with AMD Radeon HD 7970M(1x) and Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor

 

Enduro is apparently still bad for down scaling settings, but in Firestrike, the 7970M pulls ahead of the 680M by a relatively large margin (On the Clevo EM platform the 7970M got 6066 GPU and the 680M got 4130 GPU). My guess is that the 680M still performs as well if not better in games because developers have not adjusted to the GCN architecture yet.

 

Here is my 460m SLI run on core i7 950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-950 Processor,CLEVO CO. X7200

Nice to see AMD kick Nvidia in the Teeht with their 400 dollar more 680m !

I wish to see some 7970 Xfire benchmark.

Since im building a desktop, i am now convinced to skip the geforce Titan and wait for the AMD equivalent. the 8990 or something.

 

I have a feeling that they are optimizing for specific game engines / benchmarks for "remedying" the Enduro issue. I can confirm it's not fully resolved, even for the engines they were specifically optimizing for (e.g. CoD4, MW2, MW3). It's funny when Black Ops II runs better than CoD4 on this card when it should be the other way around.

I'm currently on Catalyst 13.2 beta 5.

 

Here's mine running on a 9150 SE @ stock clocks

Ice Storm: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P87223 3DMarks

Cloud Gate: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P15624 3DMarks

Fire Strike: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P3883 3DMarks

 

it is obvious that fixing dx9 game performance is not their priority

 

Isnt my 989 Firestrike score a bit on the low side ? I would have expected 1500 2000. Perhaps the SLI isnt working properly. ?!

 

sure is especially in sli. try only running on one card and see what you get. seems to be problems with some on sli and enduro.

 

NVIDIA cards have a little more overhead because of producing more eye candy. SLI users need to select "alternate frame rendering 2" as the SLI rendering mode in the NVIDIA Control Panel. Leaving it set to "NVIDIA Recommended" will produce poor scores. Also change everything else to performance options (single display performance mode, high performance versus adaptive, performance versus quality, etc.). See second screen shot below.

Here is a run with the CPU @ 4.5GHz, GPUs @ 1108/1175 - Fire Strike score 8820

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3920XM Processor Extreme Edition,Alienware M18xR2,score 8820

View attachment 91424

 

Heres my stuff, hardware and clocks as seen in my sig

AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2960XM Processor,CLEVO P170HMx

cheers!

 

very good without enduro

 

i dont think ice storm is an enduro issue, since that benchmark is heavily dependent on CPU speed. have u checked ur graphics and physics score with other users?

edit: hm, nevermind. weird thing is that the other two tests seem to be fine in ur case, concerning the graphics score. only ice storm shows a very low graphics score.

 

with enduro, using fast cpu will make ice storm up to 9xxxx but not like over 14xxxx.

 

Thats right, a correct estimate, 1723 Points
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/111590
Here is a new run with the new settings and the latest 310.90 driver.

Any ideea why i get the "Graphics Driver not Approved" message ?
What am i doing wrong, i did install the latest driver, haven't I ?
Answer, here:
http://www.3dmark.com/support/troubleshooting-my-results/#validation.driver.not.approved

 

Here are some scores to shoot for those with 680M SLI in their Clevo beasts...

3DMark Ice Storm: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3920XM Processor Extreme Edition,Alienware M18xR2 score: P180397 3DMarks

.​

3DMark Cloud Gate: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3920XM Processor Extreme Edition,Alienware M18xR2 score: P27953 3DMarks

.​

3DMark Fire Strike: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3920XM Processor Extreme Edition,Alienware M18xR2 score: P9068 3DMarks

.​

3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3920XM Processor Extreme Edition,Alienware M18xR2 score: X4829 3DMarks

 

I wonder how the p570 would do on this with the desktop cpu and two overvolted 680m's.

The p370 doesn't have much hope of getting anywhere near you with it's sloppy cooling design though.

 

The wait is killing me, my M18x needs to get here NAO lol.

Just wondering, how does an i7 3740qm oced to 4ghz compare with the 3940xm? Is it going to bottleneck the 680ms?

 

I'm not sure how effectively one can OC the 3740QM to achieve a sustained 4.0GHz on 4 cores. If you can, it should perform similar to any other Ivy Bridge CPU running at the same clock speed. The XM has a larger cache, but whether that will have a significant effect on the benchmark I am not certain. Unless the end user does not know how to set things up correctly, an XM CPU will always outperform a QM CPU, and that's one of the reasons the XM costs more.

 

Yeah, I wish I could have ponied up the extra cash for the xm, but I didn't want to wait for my refund on the M17x to go through (would take a couple weeks) so I was on a budget. I was hoping that an oc would help the 3740qm at least get close to the 3940xm (since it's pretty much the only cpu that doesn't bottleneck the 680ms)

 

You should order a tripple pipe heatsink and some IC diamond for it. That would help sustain that overclock. The only place the 3740qm would bottleneck is in benches. In games it should be fine.

 

Thanks man, I'll keep an eye out for one. Never heard of anyone using the triple pipe heatsink on non-xm processors.

 

You just need to order one from Dell. I believe Mr.Fox can help you with the part number you need to ask for.

Keep in mind that you'll need to disassemble your laptop to put it in.You can find video guides to do it on youtube.While you're at it you should repaste gpu's too with IC.
I'm pretty sure that with the new paste and heatsink the extra 400mhz would be sustainable 24/7.
Remember to extend the long term TDP in the BIOS otherwise the cpu will clock down after a while!

 

Oh ok, that makes it easier if I can just order from Dell. I'm getting a $250 gift card soon so that'll come in handy. As far as the teardown goes, it shouldn't be too much trouble. I've disassembled every laptop I've owned multiple times, and watch youtube teardown vids while waiting for a new laptop to come in

Thanks again for the help bro.

 

I see that P157HM still holds out great.
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2630QM Processor,CLEVO P170HMx

BTW
I wonder if Ice Storm is just DX9, Cloud Gate is DX10, Fire Strike is DX11?

 

Your welcome and good luck with your upgrade! :thumbsup:

Once you're done post some bench scores. I'd be intersted in how a maxed out 3740 performs.

Yes. That's just how they work. It's described under the test tab what each of them focuses on.

 

heck yeah, still going strong ill keep this baby for at least another year before i send it off into its well-deserved retirement btw, thx for ur pioneer-work on the crossflashing

 

Bought 3dmark on steam, ran Firestrike with the optimized settings. Its the 64 bit executable, and guess what, i got a bigger score:
1919
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-950 Processor,CLEVO CO. X7200

 

P1xxHM is not my fault. Is Moral Hazard fault. I committed only P1xxEM crosflash.

I still prefer to work on HM than EM.

Thank you for the clarification. I am an old. So I have a 5111 Fire Strikes in DX11 test, right?

 

oh yeah thats right, mixed it up nevertheless, still good job, balls of steel my friend!

 

btw, here a very nice article (in german, use google translate if necessary) comparing over a thousand 3dmark13 results with different hardware configs and clocks. great way to compare ur scores, since the new 3dmark is not yet included in futuremark´s result search

Futuremark 3DMark (Seite 7) - ComputerBase

 

Ok, here some results with the highest overclocking I can get with stock voltage (unfortunately I can´t get the vBios with higher voltages to work, they end up in a black screen).

Ice Storm

Spoiler

Cloud Gate

Spoiler

Fire Strike

Spoiler

 

AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P39172 3DMarks

AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P4808 3DMarks

AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx score: P589 3DMarks

Something is really fishy with my drivers lol.

Just installed windows 8. Not sure how I should fix this :/

 

well those scores sure look like ur igpu is active instead of the 7970m

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Just noticed that 3dmarkdemo was in high, but not 3dmark.exe and 3dmarkicfworkload.exe

 

good stuff, lets see those updated scores then once uve run the tests

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3610QM Processor,CLEVO P15xEMx

Is your card overclocked or something? Because I got a lot less on the first test than you.

What drivers and windows version do you have? Any tip on getting your results?

 

He's at 1045/1550 (in his signature), which is a very significant overclock

 

Yeah I noticed now.

Core clock300 MHz
Memory clock150 MHz

on my result page. Hmm, this is strange.

 

The strange part is how much larger his physics score is. I guess that is what 4.7GHz gives you XD.