The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    680M available in Clevo 4GB Vram!!! Cost $528 to upgrade compared to 7970m $238

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by micahmatthew, Jun 4, 2012.

  1. micahmatthew

    micahmatthew Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    98
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  2. Speedy Gonzalez

    Speedy Gonzalez Xtreme Notebook Speeder!

    Reputations:
    5,447
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    116
    to me looks like it cost $525 more over the 7970 :eek:

    NVM: $286 more lol
     
  3. quickstrike2

    quickstrike2 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Not worth it in my opinion. I am not looking for the absolute fastest graphics card and I can buy another graphics card at that price.
     
  4. micahmatthew

    micahmatthew Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    98
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So awful; articles are saying it's 37% faster than the GTX 570m.... Which means it is only 23% over the 675m in 3dmark11. And 24% LESS THAN 7970m.... For $286 more? ??? For gaming this is just not worth the cash in any way shape or form.

    For photoshop/3d design I suppose the CUDA could come in handy... but seriously for gaming this is a FAIL.
     
  5. BlackSabs

    BlackSabs Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    177
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Origin is always more expensive then most other resellers with a presence here on NBR. Most likely a $150-$200 upgrade over the 7970m.
     
  6. micahmatthew

    micahmatthew Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    98
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Still; thats 50% more money; for 24% LESS performance.... Sounds like a bad idea to me haha.
     
  7. Speedy Gonzalez

    Speedy Gonzalez Xtreme Notebook Speeder!

    Reputations:
    5,447
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I bet is going to be like last year with 6990m and 580m like 5% difference in performance but a premium price for the Nvidia card
     
  8. micahmatthew

    micahmatthew Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    98
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yeah thats what most people here in the Clevo forums have been speculating. It's sad that people who mostly game would fork over 50% more money for less performance just because they are a fan boy -_-. Very sad.

    I'm just hoping that in return AMD releases some optimized drivers and gives another 5-10% boost in performance to the 7970m.

    I want to OC mine a little [just 10% or so] and get some good drivers.

    And bam you can get 6,100 in 3dmark. About 20% over these leaked results of the 680m. Rofl.

    And I got mine for cheap since i pre ordered :p

    Getting it in a few weeks; really excited haha. BF3 on Ultra here I come!
     
  9. BlackSabs

    BlackSabs Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    177
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Sounds about right Speedy. No way Nvidia releases a card that is not at least equivalent to the 7970m. Hence the long delay in surfacing.
     
  10. micahmatthew

    micahmatthew Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    98
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  11. jaug1337

    jaug1337 de_dust2

    Reputations:
    2,135
    Messages:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    Trophy Points:
    231
  12. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,150
    Trophy Points:
    931
    the 37% over 570M was part of early leaks based on an earlier revision of the 680m,thus has nothing to do anymore with this actual 680m release :) its def going to beat the 7970m, just have to wait and see by how much exactly.

    edit @OP: u should probly change the thread title to "680m costs xxx $ more than 7970m", easier to have an overview that way ;)

    cheers

    Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2
     
  13. Vahlen

    Vahlen Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    243
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    In terms of parts they are usually on par with the rest of the resellers, the base and other services come at a premium similar to Mythologic. There is no way it's going to be less than a $200 upgrade over the 7970, though it will likely be more around $250+.
     
  14. hackness

    hackness Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,237
    Messages:
    2,367
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    101
    I know the GTX 680M is SMX native. But I wonder this GTX 680M comes with Hyper-Q and Dynamic Parallelism too, if it does it's definately worth the money :D

    If you want to know what SMX, Hyper-Q and Dynamic Parallelism are, check out the video below. It's at the mark 24:46.

    iStreamplanet Flash Player
     
  15. isrnick

    isrnick Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Wait, they have the 680M in stock already?
     
  16. Religion

    Religion Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
    You know I would really prefer a 2gb version that is slightly cheaper. 4gb is completely unnecessary and only drives the price up for me.
     
  17. KCETech1

    KCETech1 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,527
    Messages:
    4,112
    Likes Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    151
    photoshop 6 and CS6 dont use CUDA anymore they moved to OpenCL and as are a bunch of other pro apps ( Solidworks, MAYA, MAYHEM, 3DsMAX ) and actually a gforce kepler card is SLOWER than its predecessor in GPGPU functions in many cases. I really see this on the desktop cards and the new CS6. upcoming quadro's and teslas should but price is astranomical comparatively

    AMD and Adobe Announce OpenCL Support in Creative Suite 6 by VR-Zone.com

    Nvidia cripples GPGPU in Geforce GTX 680 - The Inquirer
     
  18. TheGreatAnonymous

    TheGreatAnonymous Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    155
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    31
    You know, for the most part 4gb isn't much use... right now. But when running Skyrim with a lot of texture mods the 2gb of vram I have now gets owned pretty hard, which makes that 4gb seem like a pretty nice luxury.
     
  19. BenWah

    BenWah Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    119
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  20. micahmatthew

    micahmatthew Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    98
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yeah I didn't know they moved to Open CL; did CS5 also support Open CL?

    So the 7970m will be taken advantage of in CS6?? Awesome!
     
  21. DEagleson

    DEagleson Gamer extraordinaire

    Reputations:
    2,529
    Messages:
    3,107
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    116