I was wondering,
Why does the x205 have only 256mb in the 8700 and the m570RU 512?
i'd like to see benchmarks of those next to eachother, also,
a clear and honest benchmark between the 8700 and the 7950 gtx giving framerates at 1900x1200 playing nowadays games.
anyone?
-
S9349: http://cdgenp01.csd.toshiba.com/content/product/pdf_files/datasheet/satellite_X205-S9349.pdf
S9359: http://cdgenp01.csd.toshiba.com/content/product/pdf_files/datasheet/satellite_X205-S9359.pdf
According to the Clevo summary specs at: http://www.clevo.com.tw/products/M570RU.asp
the M570RU has "512MB of DDRIII Video RAM on board" which certainly seems to imply that the M570RU comes with the higher-end version of the 8700M GT.
On that basis, since using shared memory is slower than using the GPU discrete memory, and since the 512MB version has a total available memory of 767MB as opposed to 511MB for the 8700M GT lite version, the M570RU would probably get somewhat higher performance numbers. Whether that would make a difference in the real world ... ?? -
where does the extra 255 mb come from?
-
The Clevo M570RU [and the D900C] have the only MXM-IV slots for videocards in the world.
They can handle the best mobile videocards over any other notebooks.
The Toshiba X205 is using a MXM-III version of the 8700M GT with some limitations to meet the 35w cap (of the MXM-III).
While the potential of the MXM-IV has yet to be tapped yet... can handle the higher end 8700M GT specs.
In fact.... rumors show that the Clevo's (w/ MXM-IV) will have a 8700M GTX in Winter (which could be the 8800M that everyone has been talking about all this time). -
Thanks for the info Gophn
-
-
k
what can we expect from an 8700/8800 gtx? ( pure speculations )
how does an 7800 gtx perform these days then? just to compare the future-ability
8700 in x205 and m570RU
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by Derq, Aug 20, 2007.