The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous pageNext page →

    ATI HD 6990m

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by terminus123, Jul 7, 2011.

  1. ichime

    ichime Notebook Elder

    Reputations:
    2,420
    Messages:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Here's some more info:

    Test system:

    i7 2820QM, 8GB Ram, Windows 7 Ultimate, Intel 510 series 250gb HD, Cat 11.5 drivers. It's probably a Clevo system from the sound of it...

    3dmark06: 21K

    Vantage: P16K (overall, don't know the GPU score)

    3dmark11: P3400

    Heaven 2.1 normal tessellation: 36 fps

    And don't ask where I got this info (and no, I didn't overclock or play with the Engineering Sample I got, because I sold it).
     
  2. Mike570U

    Mike570U Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    180
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    And I was just about to cram a 6970 in my W860cu...

    Are those results about right for the estimated 10-15% gain others have been predicting?
     
  3. terminus123

    terminus123 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    10-15% over the 6970m or GTX card?
     
  4. Mike570U

    Mike570U Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    180
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Over the 6970..?
     
  5. BenWah

    BenWah Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    119
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Looks like it's about 10% faster than 6970, I'd like one.
    580 also improved about 10% over 485.

    That'd make the difference between the new 580 and 6990 about the same as the difference between the old 6970 and 485.
     
  6. Mike570U

    Mike570U Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    180
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Indeed, I hope AMD rolls it out quickly..

    Either way, price will probably control which route I go, the 6970 can be had for $420 (US) and I don't think I can justify too much beyond that for 10%.
     
  7. eoinmfoley

    eoinmfoley Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    29
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Do you think the 6990M CF with i7 990X in X7200 at full load will need the 2nd 300W PSU like the 485M/580M SLI does?
     
  8. Mike570U

    Mike570U Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    180
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Yeah, that desktop cpu eats 130 watts all by itself...
     
  9. eoinmfoley

    eoinmfoley Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    29
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    But the 6790M CF didn't trip out the 300W PSU at full load. Kinda hoping it will only need one as they're big enough already.
     
  10. Larry@LPC-Digital

    Larry@LPC-Digital Company Representative

    Reputations:
    3,952
    Messages:
    3,580
    Likes Received:
    283
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Only if you are an EXTREME gamer or BENCHER will you need the dual PSU set up.

    We have a Dual, SLI 580M x7200 R2 with the 980x Extreme CPU and no problems at all doing benches and gaming so far on one PSU... :)
    _
     
  11. eoinmfoley

    eoinmfoley Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    29
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Thanks for that. I'll probably just get one and then upgrade to two (or a 400W if it's ever born) should the need arise..
     
  12. Saltius

    Saltius Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    626
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    When overclocked to 4GHz, six-core I7 eats at least 50W MORE than stock speed @ full load.

    If one doesn't overclock, why does he purchase an extreme other than 970?
     
  13. ichime

    ichime Notebook Elder

    Reputations:
    2,420
    Messages:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    My source also says that AMD is going to advertise it being 25% over the 6970M...
     
  14. pkhetan

    pkhetan CopyLEFT ↄ⃝

    Reputations:
    563
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    25% more what? money or performance?
     
  15. ichime

    ichime Notebook Elder

    Reputations:
    2,420
    Messages:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Performance. But from the numbers he's giving me, it looks more like 15%...20% at best. It's kinda how nVidia advertised 20% over the 485M when it's really more like 10%
     
  16. MrMoneybags

    MrMoneybags Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    31
  17. rcwillis

    rcwillis Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Wow, they are actually saying its 25% over the 580m? o_O

    [​IMG]

    edit:Clever AMD " The following slide uses simulated performance (e.g. a downclocked desktop GTX 560 Ti GPU running at mobile speeds and with only 1GB GDDR5, again with a 3.4GHz Phenom II CPU), so take these results with a grain of salt:"
     
  18. calxn

    calxn Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    80
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Those are fight words, AMD. Hope you can back it up. "...up to 25 percent faster than any other GPU that's been announced to the public."
     
  19. aduy

    aduy Keeping it cool since 93'

    Reputations:
    317
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    580m has more transistors.
     
  20. Mike570U

    Mike570U Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    180
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    What witchcraft is this? 1120 SP is a 17% increase over 6970's 960, + 35 Mhz on the core, and same memory clocks...

    Either way, flood the channels with'em.
     
  21. calxn

    calxn Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    80
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    This feels like Radeon 9700 Pro all over again. Gotta make you wonder why Nvidia would release the 580m with just a slight clock increase over the 485m. Do they have a mystery chip in their pockets? They demo'd Crysis 2 running on a mystery single notebook GPU. We all assumed it was the 580m. Perhaps it was the 590m, and Nvidia wanted to see what AMD was going to do first? Very interesting.
     
  22. aduy

    aduy Keeping it cool since 93'

    Reputations:
    317
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    how do amd sp compare to nvidia cores
     
  23. Mike570U

    Mike570U Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    180
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Like apples to oranges. :D
     
  24. putino

    putino Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    94
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I wonder if it will be possible to flash the vBios of the 6970M to perform as the 6990M...
     
  25. terminus123

    terminus123 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I think in another post they already said it's not possible.

    I'm only taking it for a grain of salt atm. Though for all those GPU techies out there, looking from the specs of the 6990m...is 25% believable?
     
  26. Mike570U

    Mike570U Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    180
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    As pointed out: 1120 SP is a 17% increase over 6970's 960 SP, + 35 Mhz on the core which is 5% boost, and same memory clocks. So.. No.

    But they will be close to each other, and competition is always nice.

    BTW Ichime updated the graph w/ a note: it is really a 6990M VS. a downclocked desktop GTX 560 Ti GPU running at mobile speeds and with only 1GB GDDR5 (which supposedly approximates the 580m)
     
  27. putino

    putino Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    94
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Why not ? May you give me a link or an explanation pls ? Thanks
     
  28. terminus123

    terminus123 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
  29. Aikimox

    Aikimox Weihenstephaner!

    Reputations:
    5,955
    Messages:
    10,196
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    466
    + some extra textures, lol
     
  30. firstnomad

    firstnomad Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I'm pretty sure the demo was running on a dual notebook GPU...
     
  31. Saltius

    Saltius Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    626
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    580m has 64TMUs @620MHz while 6990m has 56TMUs @715MHz

    They should be quite close.
     
  32. Bytales

    Bytales Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    56
    Messages:
    690
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    AnandTech - AMD Raises the Mobile Performance Bar with Radeon HD 6990M
    AMD Launches AMD Radeon HD 6990M - World's Fastest Single Mobile Graphics Processor | techPowerUp

    QUote anandtech:
    Both the AMD and NVIDIA parts should be plenty fast for 1080p mobile gaming, so the real question is more likely to be who offers the best overall value.
    Our money is still going to be on whoever can come in at a lower price point, and if recent history is any indication, that will likely be AMD with the 6990M.



    Bottom line, 6990 is faster and cheaper than 580m.
     
  33. Harleyquin07

    Harleyquin07 エミヤ

    Reputations:
    603
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Another point in AMD's favour is that unlike the 580m the 6990m is an actual upgrade in hardware and features unlike the increased stable overclock offered by the 580m, pricing should dictate that the 6990m is a winner especially as it's so close to the 580m.
     
  34. Tirenz

    Tirenz Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    735
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    41
    German article:
    AMD Radeon HD 6990M vorgestellt - Notebookcheck.com News

    It says that the card is only available in september...?

    And they "emulated" a 6990m with the Desktop 6870 and clocks of 6990m but it couldn´t outperform 580m...
    Though it´s strange they set the clock to 615 and not 715...? maybe that was a mistake...
     
  35. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,149
    Trophy Points:
    931
    hmmmm.... nah, still not worth upgrading to. ill wait and see what the next year brings along :)
     
  36. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    I'm not getting the point of your statement? More transistors only guarantees that the chip uses more silicon and is more expensive to manufacture. A very sizable portion of GTX 580M's transistors are dedicated to handling CUDA functions that have nothing to do with rendering graphics.

    In the games where the HD6970M already had the advantage over GTX 485M it's believable...but typically the performance gain will be noticeably less. Honestly, as long as the HD6990M closely matches the GTX 580M in games where the GTX 485M previously held an advantage over HD6970M the mobile performance crown should go to AMD.
     
  37. KC2PLL

    KC2PLL Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Why do you think it's not worth the upgrade?
     
  38. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Because the GTX 485M he already owns is still a respectable card.
     
  39. terminus123

    terminus123 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    yea, most likley in real benchmarks (not simulated ones), the 6990m and 580m will be around equal...so not a worthwhile upgrade from 485m at all. If the 6990m card comes out September--then screw it, I'm going for GTX 580m.
     
  40. chisox

    chisox Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  41. Blacky

    Blacky Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,044
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    331
    But what about the rumors that AMD's image quality is slightly worse than that of Nvidia's ? Any conclusive evidence on that?
     
  42. little_one

    little_one Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You can disable the AI that reduce image quality for FPS in catalsyt control center bro ....
     
  43. terminus123

    terminus123 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Yep, he's correct. What bugs me though is why do they even have this stupid AI thing on their high-end GPU drivers? it's still an "attempt" of cheating.
     
  44. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Responded to that back on page 3. :þ
     
  45. aarondr

    aarondr Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I just got my 6970m :p. Oh well, I can hope a hack to enable the rest of the SPs come out - but in all reality, the 6970m is a beast and at least this isn't the Mobility Radeon 9700 pro debacle (this is only a minor upgrade not a x2 performance upgrade LOL)
     
  46. Condottiere

    Condottiere Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    The important point, it seems to me, is this: now that we know that AMD is cheating with its 'image AI', any attempt at benchmark comparison become moot unless we know that the AI has been turned off. It's apples-and-oranges otherwise. It seems to me that this point has been lost by almost everyone in the urge to compare numbers and brag/moan.

    I'm glad many of the testing sites are now doing this, but they all should be.

    AMD should be catching a lot more hell for this than they currently are.
     
  47. Phinagle

    Phinagle Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,521
    Messages:
    4,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Nvidia has been guilty of "optimizing" for benchmarks in the past as well....and likely still are in the present, and will continue to be in the future.
     
  48. terminus123

    terminus123 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I'm just curios--never was into notebooks when I was younger, what was the Radeon 9700 debacle? I've heard of it before but not sure what it was.
     
  49. Condottiere

    Condottiere Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I agree, and like most stories in the business world, there aren't any 'good guys' here. But while Nvidia has been known to cook benchmarks and skew comparisons with wonky driver choices, AMD's decision to literally gimp the playing experience of thousands of paying customers unless they find out about 'the secret switch' is nauseating. More practically, AMD's chicanery affects more than House Benchmarks, because when fans run their own benchmarks those benchmarks will be flawed as well, and often, people are more likely to credit independent fan sources for such things over official comparisons, given the above.

    In other words, AMD has not only made a decision which negatively affects the game experience of its customers, it has turned them into unwilling marketing tools. Gah. :mad: The situations has begun to correct itself as more and more people discover the need to turn off the AI in CCC, but it doesn't make the situation any less repugnant.
     
  50. terminus123

    terminus123 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    766
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Yep tottaly agreed, seriously ATI should just completley remove the "AI" on all high-end GPU drivers--anyone who buys a high-end GPU will want the full graphics experiance anyways!

    Just a question since I haven't been up to date on AMD GPUs for awhile. Only Nvidia GPUs can still enable PhysX settings in games like Batman: Arkham City and Alice: Madness Returns right?
     
← Previous pageNext page →