Didn't see a post on BF3 Frame rates per machine, lets see where abouts folks are with their rigs. I for one am thinking of upgrading.
System:W860CU
Video Card Mobility HD 5870 with a slight OC
CPU: Intel Core i7-820Q
Memory: 4GB
OS:win 7 64bit
Driver: ATI Beta 11:10
Settings 1920x1080
All settings on high.
HABO: off
Anisotropic: filtering x1
Antialiasing deferred: off
Ambient occlusion: /HABO off
Antialiasing post: high
Motion blur: off
Low frame rate 25
High 70
Average 35-40
-
-
System: NP8150
Video Card: Radeon HD 6990M Stock
CPU: Intel Core i7-2670QM
Memory: 8GB
OS: Win 7 64bit
Driver: ATI Beta 11:10
Settings 1920x1080
Texture: Ultra
All other settings: High
HABO: On
AA: Off
AF: 16x
Motion Blur: On
Average: 40-45 -
Anyone else?
-
Ultra settings across the board, no AA, 720p, 50-60 fps in single player
-
System: Clevo P170HMx
GPU: Nvidia GTX 580M (Slight OC)
CPU: i7 2920XM 3.5GHz
Memory: 8GB
OS: Windows 7 64bit
Drivers: 285.62 WHQL
Game Resolution: 1920x1080
Textures: Ultra
Terrain: Ultra
Terrain Details: Ultra
Effects: Ultra
Rest: High
Antialiasing Deferred: Off
Antialiasing Post: Low
AF: X2
Motion Blur: Off
AO: SSAO
Vsync: Off
Never under 40fps in SP (Usually between 45-60).
MP: 35-50fps outdoors / 45-70 fps Indoors
Only time fps drops below 30 is when I'm in a tank and people are shooting rocktets at me or if a another tank misses right in front of me. I'm thinking of reducing everything back to High since I'm pretty sure I'd benefit more from the extra frames rather than the very subtle graphical improvement.
What I'm curious here is which settings uses up most resources? I'm pretty sure the different AA/AF's are not needed at this resolution (from what I've heard) but I could be mistaken.
FOV: Default -
The Specs are on my sign.
Playing on Native 1920x1080
Textures on ULTRA (this load the FHD Textures and make the game look amazing!)
Everything else on High.
AA off (since I'm playing on native ress, this is not very useful).
Ambient occlusion HABO On (this one also helps a lot on DX 11, I wonder if the game is running on DX11...)
AF: 2x (I dun see much difference with this over 2x)
I get Avg 50~60 FPS, lowest 35 highest 90.
If I apply a 15% overclock on my GTX 580M I get 60+ avg and 109 Top so I can get the best of the 120hz pannel with minimum temperature increase (76C top with OC and fn+1 active) -
Just tried it with all settings on ultra, 1080p, no AA, and Vsync ON (i hate screen tearing!) with my gtx 485m overclocked to 660/1320/1600.
Got anywhere between 35-48 fps, temps stayed between 77-84 degrees. Very very nice! -
It depends on the map.
Ultra settings no AA I get 40-60 fps on small maps like Metro.
On Caspian Border it's around 25-40 same settings.
NP8150 -
System: Clevo P170HMx
CPU: Intel Core i7 2720QM 2,2 GHz
GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6970m @ 710 MHz Core & 1000 MHz Memory
RAM: 8GB
OS: Windows 7 Professional SP1
Driver: AMD Catalyst 11.9 WHQL
Graphical settings:¨
1920x1080
Textures set to Ultra
AF set to 16x
AA off
Motion blur disabled
SSAO on, but HBAO doesent impact framerates that much.
Rest of the settings are at low.
My FPS hover around 60 but never goes below 50.
Also gives me improved visibility so i can spot airplanes through the sunflare.
Mobile AA <3 -
-
Here's the 1080p, ultra settings video i made.
Battlefield 3 - Ultra settings and 1080p on GTX 485m - Thunder Run - YouTube -
What kind of FPS can I expect on ultra/high settings for this setup on a P151HM1 Lotus from MALIBAL?
Processor: Intel® Core™ i7-2670QM, 6MB L3 Cache, 2.2-3.1GHz
Memory: (8GB) 8192MB, PC3-10660/1333MHz DDR3 - 2 SO-DIMM
Graphics Card: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 560M 1.5GB GDDR5
It just shipped today, so I should get it on Monday, or sometime next week. -
with the gtx 560m, setting in low and medium and aa off and no hbao o ssao (i dont know what it is ) get betwen 45 to 70 at 1080p
-
i7-2760QM, 6990M OC to 790/960, 8 gigs of 1600 RAM
Textures set to high, everything else on medium, no AA or AF or SSAO.
About 60-65 FPS on average. -
^What resolution? 1080p or 720?
-
If you weren't talking to me, sorry xD -
1600x900, High Textures, Low Shadows, everything else medium, no AA/AF/HBAO/etc.
Smooth 40-60 fps (guess; I know it's usually in the 50s) in multiplayer and it looks fantastic. -
-
Settings: All Ultra + MSAAx2 + HBAO @ 1080p
Drivers: AMD Catalyst 11.10 preview 3
Average FPS: 33
Min FPS: 22
Max FPS: 60 -
It's running alright, though I expected a bit more. -
King of Interns Simply a laptop enthusiast
Ah I want to get this game but the price here put me off: 70 swiss francs!!
-
I made a video with these settings:
Resolution Native: 1920 x 1080 at 120hz
Textures on: ULTRA
Shadows and everything else on: HIGH
AA: OFF (not needed since we are playing on Native resolution)
Anisotropic filter: 4X (anything over 4 won't do any good).
Ambient Occlusion: HBAO (this also helps a lot to display the game true graphics).
As usual FRAPS steals like 30% of the frames on 1920x1080 but Its still over 45 frames while recording (over 60 when not recording) as it can appreciated:
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/q-Ivy-wQGHc?version=3&hl=es_MX&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/q-Ivy-wQGHc?version=3&hl=es_MX&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width='853' height="480" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
I believe this is a very balanced config. on the GTX 580M to fully enjoy the 120hz screen and an average game experience.
I must say I'm pretty disappointed of this game since I normally use my 360 controller and Battlefield 3 don't fully support it. not rumble function, nor the "in game button display"... a real shame, but Oh well its alright for 4 hours play on the campaigning, I will be waiting for Call of Duty MW3Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2015 -
-
Get Satisfaction - People Powered Customer ServiceLast edited by a moderator: May 6, 2015 -
System: i7 2630M, 6990M, 8gb 1333 RAM
Game type: Multiplayer (don't ever play single player in bf games)
Res: 1920 x 1080
Textures on: ULTRA
Shadows and everything else on: HIGH
AA: Off
Motion Blur: Off
Anisotropic filter: 4X
Ambient Occlusion: Off
Vsync: On
I get between 50-60 (due to vsync) with these settings. Even on Casp Border. Smaller maps and indoors is a solid 60.
I have found that this is by far the best combination I have found for my setup and preference. You get most of the eye candy with great frames. In fact, I was finding that with everything on ULTRA, it was much much harder to spot enemies! -
Update with the P180HM...
Specs in Sig. Stock clocks.
1920x1080 Ultra settings including AA and everything else.
35-70 fps on all maps including casp boarder. -
I like to play with over 60fps so I keep it off.
-
-
from reading these post is there not much point in having AA deferred and post on if you are playing on native resolution? thx
-
mountainlifter_k Notebook Consultant
I play with these settings @1080p 120Hz (FOV - 75):
Everything on ULTRA except
Motion Blur off (gives me eye strain)
FXAA High (AA post)
MSAA off.
I am around 30-35 FPS most of the time and drop to 21 if a tank blows up in my face.
I dont know if you guys have seen this talk by Johan Anderson of DICE at the Nvidia Geforce Lan Party for BF3 promo.
GeForce LAN 6 - Johan Andersson Battlefield 3 Presentation Part 1 / 5 - YouTube Really worth watching; all about BF3 PC graphics.
He explains why they decided to have both MSAA and FXAA options simultaneously for the game.
screenshots of the game at these settings.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us -
I just have a general Q.
Running a Sager 8130 with:
nVidia GeForce GTX 460M 1,536MB PCI-Express GDDR5 DX11
i7-2630QM, 2.0-2.8GHz, (32nm, 6MB L3 cache)
8,192MB DDR3 1333MHz Dual Channel Memory (2 SODIMMS)
Have to run my settings on low to get 30 fps under the most taxing situations.
The big issue I have is that in most cases, there is this constant "snow" of visual artifacts raining down from upper left to lower right. Kind of like 2-3 inch darker color blobs. Seems to be worse on some maps like Seine.
Anybody else see this? I can only imagine what it's doing to my performance/framerates . . . -
J.P.@XoticPC Company Representative
That's interesting. Did you update to the most recent drivers from Nvidia's site?
-
Or as displayed in device manager 8.17.12.8562, 10/15/2011 -
J.P.@XoticPC Company Representative
Yep, that looks alright...I'll have to look into what causes that. In the meantime, even though you're on low settings, I'd suggest turning things on and off within the settings to see if it is a certain item causing those artifacts. Any other 460M users experiencing similar issues?
-
edit; removed quote, not needed
Everything on high (initially had textures on Ultra). Getting frame rates of 40-55... rarely drops to the 30's during high action.
Very pleased -
Ok, didn´t see any X7200 user, so here we go:
All settings are on the highest level!
System:X7200
Video Card: SLI GTX 485m OC to 580m stock clocks
CPU: Intel Core i7-970
Memory: 12GB
OS:win 7 64bit
Driver: 285.62
Settings 1920x1080
All settings on ULTRA
HABO: on
Anisotropic: 4x MSAA
PAA: HIGH
MOTION BLUR: ON
Antisotrop filter: 16x
Low frame rate 41
High 62 (because of vsync on of course)
Average 52-57
It runs very smooth, but I can´t say that I am THAT impressed. Before BF3 came out, people talked about it as it would be a milestone regarding graphics... but I don´t think so. It is not bad, but not THAT good. -
-
Kingpinzero ROUND ONE,FIGHT! You Win!
Those average fps you get is what i get with my G53sw at 1080p, with a lower cpu and gpu.
Are you sure your system is running ok? All drivers updated etc etc? I would expect at least 40fps on a gtx485m since its an underclocked gtx580m.
Also other users with a 580m are reporting much higher framerates with same settings as you.
Isnt it strange? -
mountainlifter_k Notebook Consultant
Multiplayer maps Caspian Border & Kharg Island
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
10781, 300000, 26, 51, 35.937
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
9988, 300000, 16, 50, 33.293
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
12926, 300000, 28, 84, 43.087
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
11701, 300000, 16, 90, 39.003
Single Player: two different levels (including the jet one)
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
1698, 44289, 33, 50, 38.339
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
64745, 1061868, 25, 114, 60.973
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
33459, 732065, 17, 124, 45.705
(Kindly ignore the max framerates for the last two SP records. They are very high because I started the Fraps benchmark during the loading screens, without thinking)
I am using the 285.62 driver set. And I'm on stock clocks only. I also only run the game with Fn+1 fans on.Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015 -
Kingpinzero ROUND ONE,FIGHT! You Win!
Well now thats what i was talking about.
It was strange to me to see BF3 running at 30fps with dips to 20 as you said, pretty impossible.
Even your lowest framerate is farily higher than what you initially posted.
Which is awesome, great machine btw, many thanks for your kind benchmark! -
mountainlifter_k Notebook Consultant
But scenes with lots of smoke just makes it drop to 16 or 17, as you can see from the results. However, while playing, I never notice it too much.
Happy battlefield-ing. ***insert BF3 buzzer noise*** -
For those with 460M's looking for any additional performance I can post my modded vbios if anyone is interested, it's based on the newer V 70.06.3B.00.08 (7/17/11) firmware and matches the 560M's stock clocks, the temperature difference is negligible.
I've been using a 560M clock matching mod of the factory 460M bios for a while but have since moved to the newer firmware revision.
Those interested let me know.
P2318 3DMarks
Battlefield 3 Frame rate check in.
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by steadfast9661, Oct 27, 2011.