The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Clevo + Ryzen: possible?

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by thegh0sts, Feb 23, 2017.

  1. XMG

    XMG Company Representative

    Reputations:
    749
    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    2,197
    Trophy Points:
    181
    I wouldn't really want to comment on that, it's a matter between the component manufacuturer and the laptop ODMs.


    Yup and to be fair to both sides quite a few 280Ms went bad as well, but the 7970M was worse. Quite a lot could be saved by baking them, but that didn't (in my experience) lead to them living a full and productive life.
     
    sicily428 likes this.
  2. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    It was the massive enduro performance hit that really haunted the cards.
     
  3. Papusan

    Papusan Jokebook's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on Filthy

    Reputations:
    42,691
    Messages:
    29,824
    Likes Received:
    59,553
    Trophy Points:
    931
  4. Reciever

    Reciever D! For Dragon!

    Reputations:
    1,520
    Messages:
    5,335
    Likes Received:
    4,247
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Basically saying those who have released AMD laptops will continue to do so and those that haven't will not.

    What a stupid wccftech article.
     
    Georgel likes this.
  5. Papusan

    Papusan Jokebook's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on Filthy

    Reputations:
    42,691
    Messages:
    29,824
    Likes Received:
    59,553
    Trophy Points:
    931
    AMD 7nm mobility lineup is being met with OEM/ODM pushback
    It turns out that AMD’s 7nm is meeting with some initial teething problems breaking (back) into the mobility industry. I found out that some ODMs have actually decided already that they are not going to be taking on AMD 7nm when it launches (more on this below). So without further ado, I will cut right to the chase.

    AMD does not have the financial ability to provide this level of support right now to everyone (they *are* providing this to some extent to Acer, ASUS and HP) and is not able to provide the relevant warranties – which is why Clevo, Tongfang and MSI feel they do not want to risk picking up AMD 7nm right now. While it goes without saying that this is bad for the gamer and narrows consumer choice, I will leave it up to the reader what to make of this.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 25, 2019
    ghegde, Georgel, raz8020 and 2 others like this.
  6. Papusan

    Papusan Jokebook's Sucks! Dont waste your $$$ on Filthy

    Reputations:
    42,691
    Messages:
    29,824
    Likes Received:
    59,553
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 25, 2019
    Georgel, raz8020 and bennyg like this.
  7. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    AMD has a habit of leaving manufacturers high and dry, so not much confidence in the market.
     
  8. Support.3@XOTIC PC

    Support.3@XOTIC PC Company Representative

    Reputations:
    1,268
    Messages:
    7,186
    Likes Received:
    1,002
    Trophy Points:
    331
    I think demand based on Zen 2 desktop chips might start to tilt that back, but only if it really blows up.
     
  9. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    If there is a market wide shift and a better support network then that does change the equation on risk.
     
← Previous page